Ahasuerus
Also in Русский · Українська
Also known as King Ahasuerus · Xerxes · Xerxes I
No verified typological identification of Ahasuerus was found in the Russell period (1879–1916); the occurrences located there are historical. Under Rutherford, the interpretation was introduced in 1931 as royal or regal power and office in the abstract, with Ahasuerus deliberately playing different roles according to the scene: Christ Jesus, Satan and his governing factors, Jehovah God and Christ together, or earthly ruling power. Preservation in 1932 consolidated this explicitly by saying that Ahasuerus could picture Satan, Jesus Christ, or Jehovah, and the 1932 Year Book repeated the Christ identification. No verified typological statement was found in the Knorr period before 1971. In 1971 the explanation became more specific: Ahasuerus pictured royal power in the hands of Jesus Christ, who was also called the Greater Ahasuerus. Under Franz, The Watchtower in 1979 retained the Christological application by comparing Jesus' exercise of regal power over the earth with Ahasuerus' rule over the Persian Empire. The 1980 occurrences located are historical or illustrative rather than new identifications.
- Esther 1:1–10:3
Key moments
- 1931 Introduced The standing explanation introduced Ahasuerus as regal or royal power in the abstract. The royal office, rather than one personal antitype throughout the entire drama, was the controlling identification.
- 1971 Refined The interpretation was stated more specifically than in 1931–1932: Ahasuerus now pictured royal power in the hands of Jesus Christ in the time of the end. The same article also treated Jesus as the Greater Ahasuerus.
Russell
Charles Taze Russell · 1877–1916
No statement filed for this period.
Rutherford
Joseph F. Rutherford · 1917–1942
-
The standing explanation introduced Ahasuerus as regal or royal power in the abstract. The royal office, rather than one personal antitype throughout the entire drama, was the controlling identification.
1 quote
Hence the conclusion is that Ahasuerus the king pictured regal or royal power in the abstract. This suggests that the rulers of the evil world are not knowingly and willingly acting for the Devil but that they are induced to do so by influence brought to bear on them and that under certain conditions the Lord might use such rulers even in behalf of his own people.
The Watchtower, May 15, 1931 -
In the opening scene involving the king and his counselors, the role of Ahasuerus was applied to Jesus Christ exercising royal authority.
1 quote
As the king of Persia addressed his wise counselors, apparently for advice, so Jesus, addressing those attending upon his throne, would ask, not for advice, as though he needed it, but rather, to determine if they had in mind what was to be done.
The Watchtower, June 1, 1931 -
When Ahasuerus used his royal authority to promote Haman, he pictured Satan the Devil and Satan's governing factors on earth. This was explicitly presented as one scene-specific use of the broader symbol of royal power.
1 quote
By having in mind that Ahasuerus the king pictured regal or royal power in office in the abstract, he is now seen exercising his power to accomplish a wicked design; hence in this the king pictured Satan the Devil and foreshadowed Satan and his governing factors on earth promoting the so-called “religious leaders” now on earth and increasing their power.
The Watchtower, June 15, 1931 -
At the stage where Esther approached the king for deliverance, Ahasuerus pictured Jehovah God and Christ together as the higher ruling powers to whom the remnant appealed.
1 quote
The going of Esther in before the king did not foreshadow the remnant appealing to worldly rulers. 15 At this particular stage of the drama Ahasuerus the king pictured Jehovah God and his Christ. Jehovah is the great King, and Christ Jesus, God’s anointed King, who performs his will. Such are the “higher powers”, as stated in the Scriptures.
The Watchtower, July 1, 1931 -
The same king was interpreted from two viewpoints in the banquet scene: to Esther he represented Christ Jesus, while to Haman he stood for earthly political power.
2 quotes
The testimony is given far and wide and with the announcement that it is done for the pleasure of the King and for the good of the people. The representatives of Satan the Devil hear the message and are permitted to partake of the feast if they so desire. To Esther the king Ahasuerus here represented the King Christ Jesus, whom the Esther class now endeavors to please.
The Watchtower, July 15, 1931 To Haman, Ahasuerus the king stood for all earthly power; and Haman, being next to the king, and being the honored guest at the banquet, would feel very much elated because of his favorable position, and would gloat over the fact that he was now in the king’s best favor and would be able to destroy all his enemies, the Jews, and particularly Mordecai.
The Watchtower, July 15, 1931 -
Preservation consolidated rather than changed the 1931 interpretation. Ahasuerus retained a multiple-role significance: depending on the scene he could picture Satan, Jesus Christ, or Jehovah.
1 quote
Sometimes in the drama he pictured Satan the rebel god, and then again he pictured the Lord Jesus Christ who is earth’s rightful King, and sometimes he pictured Jehovah.
Preservation, 1932 -
The 1932 Year Book repeated the scene-specific identification of Ahasuerus with Christ Jesus from Esther's viewpoint.
1 quote
The representatives of Satan the Devil hear the message and are permitted to partake of the feast if they so desire. To Esther the king Ahasuerus here represented the King Christ Jesus, whom the Esther class now endeavors to please.
1932 Year Book of the International Bible Students Association
Knorr
Nathan H. Knorr · 1942–1977
-
The interpretation was stated more specifically than in 1931–1932: Ahasuerus now pictured royal power in the hands of Jesus Christ in the time of the end. The same article also treated Jesus as the Greater Ahasuerus.
1 quote
Thus, King Ahasuerus, seated on his royal throne in splendor and wielding unlimited authority as to his vast empire, would well picture royal power in the hands of Jesus Christ in this "time of the end."—Dan. 12:1-4.
The Watchtower, March 15, 1971
Franz
Frederick W. Franz · 1977–1992
-
The Christological royal-power application remained in use: Jesus' regal power over the earth was directly compared with the authority Ahasuerus exercised over Persia.
1 quote
Jesus, exercising regal power over the earth as Ahasuerus did over the Persian Empire, has permitted such attempts, but has also made it possible for his anointed followers to stand for their lives as Jehovah's Christian witnesses.
The Watchtower, March 15, 1979
Governing Body
1992–
No statement filed for this period.
Thank you!
Your suggestion has been sent. New topics are added as they are researched.