Type/antitype 1933–2024

Absalom

Also in Русский · Українська

No verified prophetic identification of Absalom as a type was found in the Russell period (1879–1916); the 1908 discussion applies lessons and parallels from his conduct but does not assign him a prophetic antitype. Under Rutherford, a contextual modern comparison appears in 1933, when the clergy and their allies were said to turn people away from God like Absalom, and the same comparison was repeated in 1938. In 1940 the interpretation became explicit: rebellious ones claiming to be in line for the heavenly throne were said to be pictured by Absalom. Under Knorr, the 1944 book The Kingdom Is at Hand broadened the identification by calling Absalom and Ahithophel prototypes of Judas Iscariot and a "man of sin" class. In 1945 the clergy and their allies were again compared with Absalom in a contextual application. Later references through 1976 recount Absalom's rebellion or use him as a moral example, while the explicit prototype language in 1961 and 1965 is applied to Ahithophel, not to Absalom. No verified prophetic identification of Absalom was found in the Franz period from 1977 through 1980.

6readings
6quotes
1change

Key moments

  1. 1940 Introduced Absalom was explicitly made a prophetic picture of rebellious persons who claimed to be in line for the heavenly throne and whose ambition led them to oppose and discredit Jehovah's servants.
  2. 1944 Broadened Absalom together with Ahithophel was presented as a prototype of Judas Iscariot and of a "man of sin" class, broadening the earlier application beyond rebellious aspirants to the heavenly throne.
Download

Russell

Charles Taze Russell · 1877–1916

No statement filed for this period.

Rutherford

Joseph F. Rutherford · 1917–1942

3 readings
  1. 1933 Depends on context

    In a contextual application, the clergy and their allies in Christendom were compared with Absalom because they turned people away from God as Absalom stole the hearts of the people.

    1 quote
    They have turned many people away from God, like Absalom, who stole the hearts of the people, and this they have done in order to serve the Devil.
    The Watchtower, September 1, 1933
  2. 1938 Unchanged

    The earlier contextual comparison was repeated: the clergy were likened to Absalom in turning people away from God.

    1 quote
    The clergy have turned many people away from God, as David’s unfaithful son Absalom did, who stole the hearts of the people; and this they have done in order to serve the Devil.
    The Watchtower, October 15, 1938
  3. 1940 Introduced

    Absalom was explicitly made a prophetic picture of rebellious persons who claimed to be in line for the heavenly throne and whose ambition led them to oppose and discredit Jehovah's servants.

    1 quote
    Working together with and playing into the hands of the aforesaid agents of the Hierarchy are also the rebellious ones pictured by Absalom, who claim to be in line for the heavenly throne.
    The Watchtower, January 1, 1940

Knorr

Nathan H. Knorr · 1942–1977

2 readings
  1. 1944 Broadened

    Absalom together with Ahithophel was presented as a prototype of Judas Iscariot and of a "man of sin" class, broadening the earlier application beyond rebellious aspirants to the heavenly throne.

    1 quote
    Absalom was hung by his own long hair, and Ahithophel hung himself; both were prototypes of an infamous Judas Iscariot and a "man of sin" class.
    The Kingdom Is at Hand, 1944
  2. 1945 Depends on context

    In a contextual application, the hypocritical clergy of the day and their allies were compared with Absalom in their outwardly attractive but rebellious course.

    1 quote
    The hypocritical clergy of today and their allies occupy a similar position. The course of such compares with that of Absalom, who lived during the eleventh century before Christ.
    The Watchtower, October 15, 1945

Franz

Frederick W. Franz · 1977–1992

No statement filed for this period.

Governing Body

1992–

1 reading
  1. 2024 Depends on context

    Absalom was used as a warning about responding to injustice by taking unauthorized revenge. This was a personal ethical lesson, with no new modern prophetic identification stated; it did not expressly revoke the older application to rebellious clergy.

    1 quote
    Although Absalom’s anger was certainly understandable, he was not authorized to take matters into his own hands.​—2 Sam. 13:20-23, 28, 29.
    The Watchtower, November 2024, pp. 2–7, How to Cope With Injustice, par. 6