Type/antitype 1880–2026

Aaron

Also in Русский · Українська

Also known as Aaron the High Priest · High Priest Aaron

The interpretation of Aaron changed several times. In 1880 Aaron, robed and anointed, could represent the entire Christ, Jesus and his Church, while in specific parts of the Atonement Day drama he represented first Jesus and later the complete Christ. By 1902 Aaron as the typical high priest was identified more specifically with Christ Jesus. Under Rutherford this identification was first retained, then broadened in some statements to the sacrificing priesthood, and in 1927 the direct identification was explicitly rejected: Aaron was said not to be a type of Jesus, but to foreshadow a work that Jesus would do. Other passages used Aaron contextually for the faithful remnant. In 1936 the direct identification was restored, with Aaron again called a type of Christ Jesus. From 1942 onward the interpretation became consistently focused on Aaron as the sacrificing high priest foreshadowing Christ Jesus as Jehovah's High Priest. This identification was repeatedly restated in 1943, 1945, 1946, 1951, 1953, 1955, 1963, 1976, 1978 and 1979. No later change was found through 1980.

30readings
30quotes
4changes

Key moments

  1. 1880 Introduced Aaron when robed and anointed represented the entire Christ, Jesus together with the Church.
  2. 1902 Narrowed The typical high priest Aaron was identified specifically with Christ Jesus, the greater High Priest.
  3. 1921 Broadened Aaron was applied more broadly to the sacrificing priesthood, including the Church during its earthly career.
  4. 1927 Reversal The former direct identification was explicitly rejected. Aaron was said not to be a type of Jesus personally, but to foreshadow a work that Jesus performed.
  5. 1935 Refined The Atonement Day service of Aaron was said to foreshadow the greater work performed by Christ, the greater Priest.
  6. 1936 Reversal The 1927 rejection was reversed: Aaron was once again directly called a type of Christ Jesus, Jehovah's High Priest.
  7. 1942 Refined Aaron was identified specifically with Christ Jesus in his capacity as Jehovah's sacrificing High Priest.
Download

Russell

Charles Taze Russell · 1877–1916

6 readings
  1. 1880 Introduced

    Aaron when robed and anointed represented the entire Christ, Jesus together with the Church.

    1 quote
    They were girdled showing that we are servants under him and reckoned as anointed in him. Aaron as he stood robed and anointed represented the entire church, head and body--Jesus and his church. "The seed" in whom "all the families of the Earth shall be blessed." They are covered with the covenants and authority of their position and anointed for their work.
    The Watchtower, February 1, 1880
  2. 1880 Depends on context

    Within the Atonement Day drama Aaron had changing scene-specific applications: at the beginning he represented Jesus, in the goat sacrifice Christ in the saints, and at the close Christ together with the saints.

    1 quote
    And as Aaron made the sacrifices then, and as Christ either in Himself or in us, makes the sacrifices in this age, it follows that at the beginning of the atonement day Aaron represented Jesus Himself; in the sacrifice of the goat he represented Christ in the saints, who follow the Lord in sacrifice; and in cleansing the sanctuary and laying his hands on the head of the scapegoat, he represented Christ and the saints, who execute judgments and deliver.
    The Watchtower, November 1, 1880
  3. 1882 Unchanged

    Aaron robed and anointed was again said to represent the entire Christ.

    1 quote
    We thus see that Aaron robed and anointed represented the entire Christ (anointed one)-"The seed" in which God is about to bless all the families of the earth.
    The Watchtower, January 1882
  4. 1902 Narrowed

    The typical high priest Aaron was identified specifically with Christ Jesus, the greater High Priest.

    1 quote
    As the typical house had a high priest, Aaron, so the antitypical house has a greater high priest, Christ Jesus our Lord, the high priest of our profession.
    The Watchtower, March 15, 1902
  5. 1911 Depends on context

    In the Moses-and-Aaron spokesman scene, Aaron represented the Royal Priesthood still in the flesh.

    1 quote
    Aaron, the mouthpiece or agent of the Lord, we understand to represent the Royal Priesthood --those of the Lord's consecrated people still in the flesh, still sacrificing--those who have not yet passed beyond the veil into glory.
    The Watchtower, July 15, 1911
  6. 1915 Unchanged

    Jesus was again directly described as the antitype of Aaron, although his priesthood was said to belong to a superior order.

    1 quote
    The great antitypical Priest was to be not only a sacrificing, but also a reigning Priest. He was to have a great work beyond the time of sacrificing. He was the antitype of Aaron, but His Priesthood was of an Order entirely different--much superior every way. This great Priest, when enthroned in glory, was designed to be after the Order of Melchizedek.
    The Watchtower, October 1, 1915

Rutherford

Joseph F. Rutherford · 1917–1942

10 readings
  1. 1918 Unchanged

    Aaron represented the Head, Jesus Christ, of the great antitypical priest made up of Christ, Head and body.

    1 quote
    From the divine viewpoint there is but one great kingly priest, the Christ, Head and body. In the Jewish type Aaron represented the Head of this great antitypical priest. The type shows that the holy anointing oil was poured upon the head of the typical high priest and ran down to the hem of his garment. (Leviticus 8:12; Psalm 133:2) The sons of Aaron did not receive an individual anointing; for they belonged to Aaron, who was anointed.
    The Watchtower, August 15, 1918
  2. 1921 Broadened

    Aaron was applied more broadly to the sacrificing priesthood, including the Church during its earthly career.

    1 quote
    These are also designated members of the royal priesthood. (1 Peter 2:9,10) During their earthly career they are counted as members of the sacrificing priesthood, of which Aaron was a type. Aaron and his sons were required to serve before the Lord in the ceremonies in connection with the tabernacle in the wilderness. Two of Aaron’s sons were stricken dead because they offered strange fire before the Lord.
    The Harp of God, 1921
  3. 1927 Reversal

    The former direct identification was explicitly rejected. Aaron was said not to be a type of Jesus personally, but to foreshadow a work that Jesus performed.

    1 quote
    Aaron therefore was not a type of Jesus, but Aaron foreshadowed a work which Jesus would do and which he did.
    The Watchtower, March 15, 1927
  4. 1932 Depends on context

    In the Moses-and-Aaron testimony scene Aaron represented the faithful remnant on earth.

    1 quote
    In like manner Jesus Christ has committed the testimony to his faithful remnant on earth, whom Aaron pictured, and God has commanded that this testimony must be given, the giving of which testimony makes Satan the old Dragon very mad.
    The Watchtower, June 1, 1932
  5. 1933 Unchanged

    Aaron was again used as a type of the sacrificing priesthood.

    1 quote
    During their earthly career they are counted as members of the sacrificing priesthood, of which the Jewish priest Aaron was a type.
    The Watchtower, August 15, 1933
  6. 1934 Depends on context

    In the plague-and-testimony setting, Moses represented Christ Jesus and Aaron represented the members of Christ's body who deliver the testimony.

    1 quote
    In this connection Moses was a type of Christ Jesus, while Aaron pictured the members of the body of Christ to whom is committed "the testimony of Jesus Christ” and who deliver the testimony.
    The Watchtower, March 1, 1934
  7. 1935 Depends on context

    Aaron's anointing was specifically applied to the anointing of Jesus as the Christ.

    1 quote
    Aaron was officially designated to that place. (Ex. 40:13) The anointing of Aaron foreshadowed the anointing of Jesus as The Christ. Jesus Christ was anointed to be the Head of the new creation. (Col. 1:18, 19; Luke 4:18) "God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the holy [spirit] and with power." (Acts 10: 38) He anointed him above all others. (Heb. 1:9) He was thereby officially designated as the great High Priest.
    The Watchtower, August 1, 1935
  8. 1935 Refined

    The Atonement Day service of Aaron was said to foreshadow the greater work performed by Christ, the greater Priest.

    1 quote
    The work of service which Aaron the high priest did on the atonement day foreshadowed a better and greater work, which the greater Priest would do within the period of the Christian era.
    The Watchtower, September 15, 1935
  9. 1936 Reversal

    The 1927 rejection was reversed: Aaron was once again directly called a type of Christ Jesus, Jehovah's High Priest.

    1 quote
    Aaron, the high priest, presented the two goats, bringing them into the court before the tabernacle. In this Aaron was a type of Christ Jesus, the high priest of Jehovah. These two he-goats described in Leviticus 16: 5 were selected from amongst the goats in possession of the Israelites. The antitypical great High Priest, Christ Jesus, began the selection of the two antitypical goats in the day of the apostles.
    The Watchtower, May 15, 1936
  10. 1940 Depends on context

    In the scene of Moses and Aaron delivering testimony, Aaron again represented the remnant of Christ's spiritual brethren on earth.

    1 quote
    Moses’ brother Aaron accompanied him and took part in the work of delivering the testimony, and in this Aaron pictured or foreshadowed the remnant of Christ’s spiritual brethren yet on earth who are made the witnesses of Jehovah at the present time.
    The Watchtower, October 1, 1940

Knorr

Nathan H. Knorr · 1942–1977

9 readings
  1. 1942 Refined

    Aaron was identified specifically with Christ Jesus in his capacity as Jehovah's sacrificing High Priest.

    1 quote
    Aaron foreshadowed Christ Jesus in the capacity of sacrificing High Priest of Jehovah God, whereas the "young bullock” for a sin-offering pictured “the body of Jesus Christ” as a perfect man.
    The Watchtower, August 15, 1942
  2. 1943 Unchanged

    Aaron was again presented as pictorial of Christ Jesus functioning as Jehovah's great High Priest.

    1 quote
    Herein Aaron is pictorial of Jehovah’s great High Priest, Christ Jesus, presenting his life right as a human creature in the heavenly courts of Jehovah, as a sin-offering for imperfect men who are devoted to God.
    The Watchtower, December 1, 1943
  3. 1945 Unchanged

    Aaron typified Christ Jesus as God's High Priest, while Aaron's sons typified the members of Christ's body.

    1 quote
    Aaron typified Christ Jesus, God’s High Priest; and Aaron’s sons typified the footstep followers of Christ Jesus, the members of Christ’s body.
    The Watchtower, February 1, 1945
  4. 1946 Unchanged

    Aaron the high priest continued to typify or foreshadow Christ Jesus as High Priest, while Aaron's sons pictured Christ's underpriests.

    1 quote
    We keep in mind that Aaron the high priest typifies or foreshadows Christ Jesus as High Priest, and that the sons of Aaron picture the footstep followers of Christ who are underpriests of his royal priesthood.
    The Watchtower, June 1, 1946
  5. 1951 Unchanged

    Aaron again foreshadowed Jehovah's great High Priest, the promised Seed, while Aaron's sons pictured those associated with that High Priest.

    1 quote
    So Aaron foreshadowed Jehovah’s great High Priest who would offer the real sacrifice that actually takes away the world’s sin, namely, the Promised Seed of God’s woman.
    What Has Religion Done for Mankind?, 1951
  6. 1953 Unchanged

    In the Atonement Day picture Jesus fulfilled the role performed by Aaron as sacrificing high priest.

    1 quote
    The high priest, having put off his golden garments, bathed, and put on his special linen garments, proceeded to the divinely ordained services of the day. Here, then, begins the picture of the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Jesus himself fulfills the parts of both sacrificing high priest and sacrificial victims. These victims for a sin offering consisted of a young bullock and a kid of the goats, both perfect animals, without blemish.
    The Watchtower, March 15, 1953
  7. 1955 Unchanged

    The identification was made explicit: Aaron as sacrificing high priest foreshadowed Jesus, and Jesus Christ was the antitype.

    1 quote
    In other words, Aaron as sacrificing high priest foreshadowed Jesus the Son of God who sacrificed himself. That Jehovah God used the nation of Israel to provide many types or shadows is stated in these words respecting Israel: “Now these things became our examples [or, types], for us not to be persons desiring injurious things, . . . Now these things went on befalling them as examples [or, for a typical purpose] and they were written for a warning to us upon whom the accomplished ends of the systems of things have arrived.”
    You May Survive Armageddon into God's New World, 1955
  8. 1963 Unchanged

    Aaron, high priest of the old covenant, was again paralleled with Christ Jesus as High Priest of the new covenant.

    1 quote
    In chapters 7 to 10 of his letter to the Hebrews, Paul first draws the parallels between Aaron, the high priest of the old covenant, and Christ Jesus as the High Priest of the new covenant.
    The Watchtower, March 1, 1963
  9. 1976 Unchanged

    Aaron, Israel's first high priest, was again explicitly identified as foreshadowing Jesus Christ serving as God's High Priest.

    1 quote
    In offering himself up as a sacrificial Lamb, Jesus Christ served as God's High Priest who was foreshadowed by Israel's first high priest, namely, Aaron of the tribe of Levi.
    The Watchtower, April 15, 1976

Franz

Frederick W. Franz · 1977–1992

2 readings
  1. 1978 Unchanged

    Under Franz the same identification continued: Jesus Christ was explicitly described as serving as the antitype of Israel's first high priest, Aaron.

    1 quote
    Even Jesus Christ himself, when on earth, did not speak of himself as a priest, even though he was then serving as the antitype of Israel's first high priest, Aaron the brother of Moses.
    The Watchtower, July 1, 1978
  2. 1979 Unchanged

    Jesus Christ was again directly called the antitype of high priest Aaron, while also being a royal priest like Melchizedek.

    1 quote
    This one became the antitype of the high priest Aaron and has also become a priest upon his heavenly throne, like Melchizedek.
    The Watchtower, December 1, 1979

Governing Body

1992–

3 readings
  1. 2014 Unchanged

    Aaron continued to represent Jesus as High Priest, while Aaron’s sons represented Jesus’ anointed followers. The washing of Aaron was associated with Jesus’ inherent cleanness, not a need to remove sins; his sons’ washing illustrated the anointed Christians’ cleansing.

    1 quote
    Aaron represents Jesus Christ and Aaron’s sons represent Jesus’ anointed followers. So did the washing of Aaron represent a cleansing of Jesus? No, for Jesus was sinless and “without blemish,” thus having no need for cleansing.
    The Watchtower, November 15, 2014, pp. 8–12, Why We Must Be Holy, pars. 3–5
  2. 2023 Unchanged

    Aaron and Israel’s succession of high priests were contrasted with Jesus, the enduring, sinless High Priest. The priestly pattern continued to explain Jesus’ ministry and sacrifice; no new personal antitype was proposed.

    1 quote
    a sharp contrast between Israel’s high priests and the great High Priest, Jesus Christ
    The Watchtower, October 2023, pp. 24–29, Cherish Your Privilege to Worship in Jehovah’s Spiritual Temple, pars. 8–9
  3. 2026 Unchanged

    Aaron’s priesthood and Israel’s sacrificial arrangement were again presented as anticipating Christ’s priestly work. Jesus’ perfect sacrifice was contrasted with animal offerings, and the 144,000 were to serve alongside him as heavenly kings and priests during the Thousand Year Reign.

    1 quote
    Moses’ brother, Aaron, and his descendants were assigned to serve as priests. […] This arrangement provided a foretaste of what was to come.
    The Watchtower, September 2026, pp. 20–25, How the Priesthood Reveals Jehovah’s Love, pars. 8–10