The Watchtower, September 1, 1980

Download: PDF — The Watchtower, September 1, 1980

The Watchtower — September 1, 1980

Source: jw.org

Contents

Page Two

The Pursuit of Security

Security Now and Forever

Bible Truth Shows the Way to Security

Jehovah—A Secure Height

Insight on the News

Follow the Great Exemplar

Showing Concern for the “Flock of God”

Overseers—Be Fine Examples to “the Flock”

It Revived Our Family Spiritually

Questions From Readers

The Roaring Lion

Annual Meeting—October 1, 1980

A Bible You Can Understand

Are You “Aglow with the Spirit”?

Page Two

OUR COVER: That elusive thing, security! But how good to know that the Creator of mankind can provide real security now, and on into the eternal future! See the following pages

The Pursuit of Security

MR. AND Mrs. B—— and their three teen-age children lived in Africa. For 20 years they had developed their beautiful farm and had invested their earnings in a comfortable home, crops, livestock and farm machinery. This became their little fortress, their refuge in time of trouble and sorrow, their source of refreshment and rest after each hard day’s work. They felt secure.

Overnight, things changed. For some time political forces had been gaining strength in the country. Men bent on bringing about a change by force were committing acts of terrorism and had laid land mines in the rough unpaved roads of the farming areas. As Mr. B—— returned in his Land Rover from a weekly trip into town, he detonated one of these and was killed instantly.

Mrs. B—— and her family no longer felt secure. With the increasing threats of violence in the neighborhood, anxieties in caring for the farm and with no man about the house, she felt forced to abandon the farm that at one time had meant security. The family left for another country in the hope of finding a more secure way of life.

In this same African country, the scene changed tremendously in a few years. Farm homesteads surrounded by rich tropical vegetation and bearing a “welcome” sign were fenced in with high steel netting surmounted by barbed wire. Sandbags were placed around the walls of homes, and windows were protected with steel mesh.

Town life changed too as more and more people installed burglar alarms, mounted heavy gates with locks and chains at the entrances of their property, and kept guard dogs to repel unwanted intruders. Shop windows were treated with special tape to prevent them from shattering. Guards were posted to search shoppers as they entered supermarkets. Vacationers hired policemen to protect their homes during their periods of absence.

In many areas, a once peaceful ride through the African countryside became a tense drive from one town to the next. Travelers were advised to check with the police before leaving, and many traveled in convoy protected by armored vehicles. Martial law and curfews became something that people came to view as part of daily living.

Apart from these security measures, many who were in a position to do so made additional arrangements for their own security by investing in gold, silver, jewelry and works of art or by putting their money in foreign bank accounts. They did this so that, if things did not turn out for the better, they would still have some assets.

Such developments are not unique to that particular country. Possibly in your community you have seen some of the same security arrangements and the increased attention given by many people to the safety of their own homes and families. The question is, Do these efforts really bring about the peace of mind and security that we all desire?

Is Military Strength the Answer?

The same concern for security is reflected in the actions of governments. Many are taking unprecedented steps to safeguard their borders and to protect their diplomats. The queen of England’s visit to southern Africa and the pope’s visit to Ireland involved the mobilization of hundreds of men solely for security purposes. Movement of ships, aircraft or troops to places that are considered to be of strategic importance is interpreted by some countries as a threat to their national security and often is met by counter military developments.

Most governments share the general belief that their national security depends on military preparedness. Illustrating this, UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) recently reported that the world’s expenditure on armaments is “not far off $1 million a minute” and that 75 percent of this is spent by the Third World. (The Courier, April 1979, p. 19) But does this enormous military spending bring a feeling of true security to persons living in those countries where they see famine and waterborne diseases taking thousands as their daily toll?

Again we ask, Does military strength really mean security? True, a person can push such thoughts to the back of his mind. But can he really feel secure when he seriously contemplates the fact that governments around the world have enough in the way of explosive devices to kill all of us several times over? To illustrate: Could you rest peacefully at night with a machine gun under your bed while knowing that your neighbor has one like it pointing at your house and that he is itching for the opportunity to use it when he feels there would be no danger to himself?

Desire for Security Common to All

It is only natural that all of us should wish to feel secure. Even in the animal world there is a built-in desire for security. Birds build their nests in the most disguised or difficult-to-approach places. Squirrels store nuts for use during the colder part of the year. Cats about to give birth investigate every cupboard in the house to search for a protected nook in which to nourish their young.

The question that faces all of us today is, Where can we look for security? Animals base their sense of security instinctively on material things. But what about man? Does our security lie in material things, making us no better than animals? Does it depend on our employment or, perhaps, on accumulated wealth in the form of gold, silver or bank accounts? Can armaments make our way of life secure? Or, is security to be found under a particular form of government that may appear to be more stable than others?

Security Now and Forever

OUR Creator, who knows the value of everything, inspired men to offer this counsel: “Whoever relies on his wealth is riding for a fall.” “A king is not saved by a great army, nor a warrior delivered by great strength.” “A man cannot trust his horse to save him, nor can it deliver him for all its strength.” (Prov. 11:28; Ps. 33:16, 17, The New English Bible) Jesus Christ truthfully stated that “even when a man has more than enough, his wealth does not give him life.”—Luke 12:15, NE.

Of course, in a worsening criminal climate, we may have to take certain practical steps to safeguard our life and our possessions. But we must recognize that, at best, these measures are only temporary and in no way guarantee our security. What we really desire is the assurance that no set of outside circumstances can do us lasting harm. Is it possible to live with such confidence? Is there any source of strength and authority that can make our way of life secure now and even forever? Can we live in security even when we are threatened by violence, food shortage or economic collapse?

Real Security Identified

Here is something to ponder: Why was it that, in ancient Israel, families could leave their homes and villages unprotected and journey to Jerusalem for their religious festivals even though they were surrounded by enemy nations? How could it be that when Jerusalem was threatened by a siege by the mighty Assyrian army not a drop of Israelite blood was spilled and yet 185,000 enemy soldiers fell in one night? (2 Ki. 19:32-35) How could a nation of some three million men, women and children live for 40 years in a “vast and terrible wilderness infested with poisonous snakes and scorpions, a thirsty, waterless land”?—Deut. 8:15, NE.

Jehovah their God, the Creator of all things, was the one making their life secure. It proved to be just as the inspired psalmist David declared: “In peace I will both lie down and sleep, for you yourself alone, O Jehovah, make me dwell in security.”—Ps. 4:8.

Do you doubt that Jehovah God, our heavenly Father, would care for us in the 20th century in the same way that he cared for the Israelites back there? Suppose your local bank president said to you: “I don’t want you to worry about anything. Just let me know what you need and I will take care of it.” Would not such a promise alleviate your concern about security? Of course, it is unlikely that a bank president could give this guarantee. However, Jehovah God has assured all of his faithful servants that he will care for all their needs. (Matt. 6:31-33) We can have full confidence in this because the Most High always carries out his word, as shown by examples, past and present.—Josh. 21:45.

Wise King Solomon came to recognize the limited value of material things and at the same time experienced the close relationship with Jehovah God that enabled him to live in security. Solomon wrote: “The valuable things of the rich are his strong town, and they are like a protective wall in his imagination.” (Prov. 18:11) How true—“in his imagination”! The rich man imagines that these valuable things will protect him when calamity strikes. But how often has experience shown that such a “protective wall” is unreal and offers no protection in times of economic collapse, runaway inflation, political upheaval or terminal illness!

In Proverbs 18:10, Solomon makes this contrast: “The name of Jehovah is a strong tower. Into it the righteous runs and is given protection.” There is no crisis of any proportion nor any set of circumstances that can place a servant of God beyond divine help. Here, then, lies the source of real security—our personal relationship with our loving Father.—Ps. 59:16, 17; 62:5-8.

How Can We Be Assured of Protection?

This confidence does not develop overnight. Like a tree that grows stronger with each year, firmer with each storm it survives, our faith in Jehovah is strengthened as we see his righteous ways work out for the best in our lives. Our daily study of his Word, the time we spend in preaching the “good news,” our regularly seeking him in prayer—all of these contribute to this personal bond.

Isaiah described the kind of security that we desire in these words: “He is the one that will reside on the heights themselves; his secure height will be craggy places difficult to approach. His own bread will certainly be given him; his water supply will be unfailing.” (Isa. 33:16) However, this security is only for those who desire to live a life that contributes to the welfare of others. Isaiah also stated: “There is one who is walking in continual righteousness and speaking what is upright, who is rejecting the unjust gain from frauds, who is shaking his hands clear from taking hold on a bribe, who is stopping up his ear from listening to bloodshed, and who is closing his eyes so as not to see what is bad.” (Isa. 33:15) How do these requirements for God’s protection apply in modern times?

“Continual righteousness” suggests a daily pursuit of Jehovah’s standards of righteousness or honesty. The words “rejecting the unjust gain” remind us that we should not imitate the get-rich-quick ways of the world. In addition to not accepting bribes, never allowing a favor or material gain to color judgment, a person who wishes to have the approval of Jehovah must be a person who is “stopping up his ear from listening to bloodshed, and who is closing his eyes so as not to see what is bad.” Twentieth-century films, books and magazines were not available to the prophet, but one who desires a close friendship with Jehovah would avoid violent and immoral entertainment today.

Our adherence to right principles contributes to our enjoying security. Wise King Solomon summed up the matter in a few words: “He that is walking in integrity will walk in security.”—Prov. 10:9.

At times, some Witnesses of Jehovah also have experienced what they viewed as divine protection. Take, for example, Brother Z——. He was reading The Watchtower in his car one day when someone suddenly grabbed him around the neck. He prayed fervently to Jehovah. The attacker became motionless, and his grip slackened. Brother Z—— started up the car, bade farewell and left the man standing like a statue in the middle of the road.

Then there was a missionary from Kenya. Her parents were bitterly opposed when she started to serve Jehovah. The father threatened her with death if she did not leave those “white monkeys,” as he called the Witnesses. He hired thugs to harm her. She reports: “Jehovah’s protection enabled me never to fall into their hands.”

As these experiences illustrate, Christians do have to deal with critical situations. However, with full trust in Jehovah, we can be confident that absolutely nothing can do us lasting harm. Our heavenly Father has promised: “I will by no means leave you nor by any means forsake you.” So we can confidently react to any threat to our security, saying: “Jehovah is my helper; I will not be afraid. What can man do to me?”—Heb. 13:5, 6.

Very soon now the whole human family will experience a crisis that will demolish the seemingly protective walls offered by wealth, military might or political power. Only those who have trusted in the unseen but mighty hand of Jehovah will survive and enjoy security forever under the righteous rule of God’s kingdom. (Rev. 21:1, 4) May this be your happy lot for having developed a close personal tie with the Most High.

Bible Truth Shows the Way to Security

—Report from the Dominican Republic

SOME 600 miles (960 km) east of Florida, between the islands of Cuba and Puerto Rico, lies the Caribbean island of Hispaniola. The eastern two thirds of this island is occupied by the Dominican Republic. Its land is well watered, which makes for good agriculture. Products include sugarcane, coffee and cocoa, as well as fruits like papayas, bananas, mangoes and pineapples.

People of the Dominican Republic are friendly and enjoy getting into lively conversations. They gesture with hands, face, and even the whole body. Many Dominicans are Protestants, but most are Roman Catholics, as were the European settlers who came to Hispaniola island from Spain during the 15th century.

How would the cordial and humble people of this Caribbean country respond to Bible truth? On April 1, 1945, missionaries from the Watchtower Bible School of Gilead began finding out. They checked into a hotel in the heart of Santo Domingo and the very same day they set out to locate a doctor who had expressed interest in Bible study and whose address had been given to them while they lived in New York. The doctor was located and began studying the Scriptures. A neighbor joined in in these discussions. As a result, Juan Pedro Green and Moisés Rollins were the first Dominicans to become Jehovah’s Witnesses.

The work of sharing Bible truth with Dominicans was not confined to Santo Domingo but soon spread into the interior. The missionaries worked north to Santiago, the second-largest city in the republic. Then they pushed farther north to Puerto Plata on the seacoast. In these places many enjoyed listening to Bible truths that they had never heard at church.

Soon after their preaching activities began, Jehovah’s Witnesses in the Dominican Republic enjoyed a visit by N. H. Knorr and F. W. Franz, then president and vice-president of the Watch Tower Society. As a result of that visit more missionaries were sent to the country. Eventually missionary homes were established in Santiago, Puerto Plata, San Francisco de Macorís, La Romana, and San Pedro de Macorís.

At the close of 1946, there were 28 Witnesses in the republic. Since the majority of people here were unfamiliar with even basic Bible teachings, the message proclaimed by this small group sounded strange. The number of Witnesses grew slowly at first. In fact, their work met with serious opposition shortly after getting under way. But ‘in times of distress, Jehovah became their secure height,’ even as the psalmist David said.—Ps. 9:9.

Followers of Jesus Christ take a neutral position with regard to human political affairs and conflicts. For this, they expect to encounter persecution in some places. (John 15:18-20) Opposition to Jehovah’s Witnesses in the Dominican Republic began in 1948. At that time the country was ruled by dictator Rafael Trujillo. During 1948, a noted member of Trujillo’s Partido Dominicano (Dominican Party) accepted the Biblical message proclaimed by Jehovah’s Witnesses and made important changes in his life. He started boldly sharing the Bible’s message with others in his hometown of San Cristobal. Government officials there were displeased with the fine response that people were giving to that message. A Catholic priest and local writers raised their voices in opposition to the activities of Jehovah’s Witnesses. In June 1950, the Witnesses were placed under official ban. The ban was removed in 1956, but imposed once again a year later. It was not removed until 1960.

Serving Under Ban

Did the ban succeed in stamping out the proclamation of Bible truth by Jehovah’s Witnesses? On the contrary, this work prospered. As noted above, there were 28 Witnesses in the Dominican Republic in 1946. When the ban was lifted in 1960, this number had grown to 460.

The years 1961 and 1962 were a period of reorganization. The Watch Tower Society arranged for traveling representatives to visit and strengthen the congregations. In 1961, 17 full-time evangelizers were sent into areas of the republic previously untouched. These efforts proved to be fruitful, and by 1963 more than 1,000 Dominicans were showing active appreciation of the psalmist’s words: “You yourself alone, O Jehovah, make me dwell in security.”—Ps. 4:8.

Reaching Out into the Rurals

Bible-educational activity was going on in all the cities and towns of this country by 1973. In December of that year, the Society made arrangements to care for the spiritual needs of people living in remote rural areas. Congregations received letters inviting persons to spend two months preaching in such rural areas. Nineteen “regular pioneers” (full-time preachers) volunteered for this special service. Between December 1973 and January 1977, six groups were organized and sent to places where previously there had been little or no activity of Jehovah’s Witnesses. How did these volunteers go about their work? One of them relates:

“First we moved to a central place in the area where we were to preach. We rented an old ‘kitchen’ (a little thatched-roof hut built outside of houses). There we settled down with a small bed, a little table stove, a pressure cooker and other such items. Every day we got up early, had a good breakfast and equipped ourselves with an abundance of literature that explains basic Bible teachings. At the start of the day we would be loaded down with literature. But this would not last long. People were delighted to hear about the Word of God. As we continued preaching, the cartons of publications became lighter.

“After a day of introducing the Bible’s message and leaving literature with people, we would spend a second day making return visits on those who showed interest. As the country folk had little money, we exchanged Bible publications for chickens, eggs and fruits. Thanks to Jehovah, we never went hungry.”

Response by residents of these outlying areas was remarkable. Many heard the Bible read to them for the very first time in their life. In some cases religious leaders had told people that Jehovah is the Devil. How surprised they were to read Bible texts such as these: “You, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth.” “Jah Jehovah is my strength and my might, and he came to be the salvation of me”! (Ps. 83:18; Isa. 12:2) In some places the interest was so great that public meetings were organized. One of these gatherings was attended by 68 persons. They were so desirous of learning about the Word of God that they offered to rent a house to “set up a church.” They really wanted spiritual security. “Some wept at our departure,” relates one of the pioneers. Plans are under way for campaigns of preaching in these places.

On one occasion Jesus told his listeners: “Come to me, all you who are toiling and loaded down, and I will refresh you.” (Matt. 11:28) Many persons in the Dominican Republic are finding that refreshment, along with spiritual security, as Jehovah’s Witnesses continue the preaching of the “good news” in this land.—Matt. 24:14.

Jehovah—A Secure Height

In a South American country a former union official studied with Jehovah’s Witnesses, accepted Bible truth and was baptized. In that same month he was stopped on the way home from work by the military police who asked for his identification card. Upon presenting it he was ordered to get into an army truck. He asked the officer in charge if he could notify his wife but was told that was impossible. It appears that because of his previous union connections he was suspected of being a Communist.

He was blindfolded and driven to a barbed-wire enclosure where there were about 100 men who likewise were suspected of being Communists, as well as some hardened criminals, including one charged with the murder of six men, also a journalist. As night came on it got cold, but the men were given no bedding, so they curled up and slept on the ground like animals. Early the next morning one of the commanding officers lined them up and ordered them to sing the national anthem and salute the flag. The Witness refused to do either, for which the officer ridiculed him.

The prisoners received one meal a day at noontime. The others noticed that the Witness silently prayed before eating, and began to ridicule him, even heckling him. On the third day while this was going on the murderer came over to them, and said: “I’ve been listening to you guys for three days now. The next one who says something bad about this man will be the seventh one I murder. Believe me, I’ll find a way to shut you guys up for good!” That same day another man called all the men together and asked the Witness if he could pray for them, and the following day they asked him to offer prayer before the meal. In time, he was able to witness to all the men.

Every afternoon a number of prisoners were taken for interrogation. Some they never saw again. When the journalist returned, he looked glassy-eyed and did not seem to know where he had been. In the meantime, the wife of the Witness had been trying in vain to get some information regarding the disappearance of her husband.

On the ninth day it was the turn of the Witness. He was led blindfolded to the interrogation point where he was severely beaten and questioned for some eight hours. In reply to their questions, he told them about Jehovah and Christian neutrality.

Finally, he was informed that he was to be hanged. They asked him if he had any last words. He requested that they tell his wife what had happened to him. They then asked him if he was not afraid to die so young. He replied: “If you had picked me up some months ago I guess I would have been very afraid of dying. But the Bible says that death is like sleeping. And I firmly believe that Jehovah will resurrect the dead. One day you, too, Sir, will have to face death.”

They then led him to the gallows, the Witness praying for Jehovah to strengthen him to keep faithful and for God to care for his wife and children. They put the noose around his neck. The order was given to release the trapdoor, but he only fell to his feet. It had been a trick. After that he and some others were blindfolded, handcuffed and driven to the place where he had been seized nine days before. It was Sunday, and so he headed for the Kingdom Hall where he found his wife and children. It was as if he had been resurrected.

Jehovah had indeed proved to be a “secure height” for this newly baptized Witness during those days of trial.—Ps. 144:1, 2.

Insight on the News

Dangers of Spiritism

● The newspaper “Diário de Pernambuco” tells of a monstrous crime in Olinda, Brazil, that illustrates the dangers of toying with spiritism. A man strangled his daughter, who was a year and five months old, and when questioned by police he said: “A spirit came down into my body and forced me to do this. I was disconcerted, not knowing what I was doing and finally I committed this foolishness.”

Relating what led to the crime, the man said that when doctors could not cure his illness, “I decided to accept the opinion of some friends and went to look for a voodoo priestess. I began to attend the ceremonies, and she prescribed for me a lot of fetishes, performed some voodoo rituals over me, and I got all right. Then she told me I should pay all the fetish obligations, otherwise terrible things would happen to me. Since I do not believe much in these things, I did not pay any attention to her threats. I did not do anything that she ordered to be done, and it all ended up in this happening to me.”

According to the newspaper, his story is not uncommon among the “macumba” (Brazilian voodoo) followers. Wisely, the Bible warns us to keep away from every practice associated with spiritism. Spiritism brings a person under the influence of unseen, but very real, evil powers: Satan the Devil and his demons.—2 Cor. 4:4; Gal. 5:20, 21; Rev. 21:8; 22:15.

‘Joyful Heart a Curer’

● “There appears to be considerable truth to the belief that the happier you are the longer you live,” stated “The Wall Street Journal.” It cited a study made of university graduates whose lives were followed for 32 years. It was found that chronic anxiety, depression and emotional maladjustment increased the risk of early aging, disability and death from physical illness. On the other hand, it was found that good mental health retarded the aging, the disability and the death rates. In the “best” adjusted group of men, 57 of 59 were still in excellent health by the age of 53. However, in the “worst” adjusted group only 30 of 48 were still in good health, the others having died or having become chronically ill.

Long ago, the Bible noted: “A heart that is joyful does good as a curer, but a spirit that is stricken makes the bones dry.” (Prov. 17:22) Similarly: “A joyful heart has a good effect on the countenance.” (Prov. 15:13) Many have found that, by turning to the Bible and learning about God and his purpose to establish a righteous new order on earth, they have considerably lessened their anxieties. Also, by doing God’s will they come under the influence of his powerful holy spirit that brings “love, joy, peace, . . . mildness, self-control,” all of which help to produce “a joyful heart.”—Gal. 5:22, 23.

No Rules Religion

● A national convention of the United Methodist Church reaffirmed that it is the most “open church in the country,” reported Denver “Post” religious editor Virginia Culver. She wrote: “The Church doesn’t have a statement or creed to which members must subscribe, and most members don’t want any such thing.” A minister of the church stated: “We trust in God’s love more than in institutions, or rituals or the Bible.” Evidently, each person is relatively free to believe what he wants, and to do what he wants, as though God had no specific rules for human behavior and worship.

How does this square with God’s view of the matter? “My law do not forget, and my commandments may your heart observe . . . Trust in Jehovah with all your heart and do not lean upon your own understanding.” (Prov. 3:1, 5) “All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness, that the man of God may be fully competent, completely equipped for every good work.”—2 Tim. 3:16, 17.

Without using God’s own Word as a guide, an organization may call itself a religion, but it cannot be true Christianity. It is merely religious anarchy, which is common in the world. The bad fruitage of such religions shows that they do not originate with God.—Matt. 7:13-17.

Follow the Great Exemplar

PEOPLE often are influenced by what others say and do. Whether for good or for bad, the example set by a family head, a religious leader or a well-known national figure affects individuals. Has your own attitude and way of life been affected by those to whom you have looked as examples?

Tragic have been the results of following the bad examples of religious and political leaders. Recently, Jim Jones brought over 900 of his religious followers to a suicidal end in Jonestown, Guyana. Earlier in this century, the whole world suffered when Adolf Hitler and his party followers plunged the world into a holocaust. Many present-day acts of terrorism throughout the world are due to the influence of men who are seeking to publicize their cause or aspirations. The increasing number of persons seeking notoriety may remind us of the Bible’s prediction: “Wicked men and impostors will advance from bad to worse, misleading and being misled.”—2 Tim. 3:13.

The trend today, as far as wicked men and their aims are concerned, is moving in that direction—“from bad to worse.” But who is chiefly responsible for this state of affairs? The Bible alone provides the reliable answer. Please note that at 2 Timothy 3:13, just quoted, the apostle Paul stated that wicked men not only were misleading others but were “being misled.” Basically, by whom? The same apostle identified “the god of this system of things” as the one chiefly responsible for blinding so many. (2 Cor. 4:4) And who is this? Satan the Devil, who has used his deceptive powers for centuries, from the very time of mankind’s fall into sin, when this archdeceiver misled the first two human creatures. He then used the serpent as his visible instrument. (Gen. 3:1-7) Since then, the Devil has used a variety of individuals and organizations, including the worldwide false religious empire Babylon the Great. And it can be said that “the whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one.”—Rev. 17:1-5; 1 John 5:19.

At this point in history, the Devil knows that his time is short. This adds to the increasing dangers among which we live. As individuals, we must be sure that we do not fall into his trap, for he “is misleading the entire inhabited earth.” After disclosing his vision of heavenly warfare, the apostle John wrote: “So down the great dragon was hurled, the original serpent, the one called Devil and Satan, who is misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him.” We are in the advanced period of his short confinement within the vicinity of the earth. This accounts for the widespread deception, trouble and woe, with wicked men misleading and being misled, all under the influence of God’s chief adversary, Satan the Devil.—Rev. 12:7-12.

Our Great Exemplar

There is one Leader who never was nor ever will be under the control and influence of “the god of this system of things.” Nineteen centuries ago, that Leader provided an example that has influenced his followers in a wholesome, lifesaving way. Shortly after his baptism in the Jordan River and his anointing with the holy spirit, that One had an encounter with the Devil. Read the Bible account of it at Matthew 4:1-11. Who is there identified as having resisted the Devil’s wily efforts to turn him aside from serving and worshiping God? Why, none other than Jesus Christ, the Son of the Most High God, Jehovah!

Jesus did not allow himself to be influenced by the Devil’s temptations, but resisted each thrust. By effectively using the Scriptures, Jesus turned aside each of Satan’s temptations. Failing in his wicked efforts, the Devil was bent on ‘bruising’ Jesus by bringing about his death.—Gen. 3:15.

There is no question that Jesus Christ was different from sinful human leaders. His whole life was devoted to accomplishing his Father’s will, not his own. (John 5:30) In preaching about God’s kingdom and making known his Father’s name and purpose, Jesus Christ was willing to undergo insults, reproach and persecutions. (Matt. 26:67, 68; John 15:20, 21; Rom. 15:3) Finally, he submitted to an ignominious death on a torture stake. (Phil. 2:8) Jesus Christ was, indeed, the Great Exemplar for all who desire to please the heavenly Father, Jehovah.—Heb. 12:1-3.

“No Part of the World”

When standing before the Roman governor Pontius Pilate, Jesus made it clear that His kingdom is “no part of the world.” (John 18:36, 37) Accordingly, rather than fighting with carnal weapons and rising up against the established order, Jesus’ followers remain neutral as far as worldly controversies are concerned. This is because they, like their Great Exemplar, are “no part of the world.” (John 15:19; 17:14, 16) For them to be truly influenced by what their Master taught and did, they must avoid the spirit of the world and must not get entangled in its affairs.—1 John 2:15-17.

This is not easy, and it cannot be done in the disciples’ own strength. Fittingly, therefore, Jesus petitioned God in their behalf, saying: “I request you, not to take them out of the world, but to watch over them because of the wicked one.” (John 17:15) Jesus knew that he would be leaving the earthly scene and that his followers would need heavenly watchcare and protection. Moreover, there would be a constant need for them to be on guard against the Adversary.—Jas. 4:7, 8.

Although being absent because of laying aside his fleshly body in sacrificial death, Jesus Christ would still be in a position to influence and direct the steps of his true followers, doing so from his lofty place at God’s right hand. (Heb. 10:12, 13) In addition, they would have the help of the holy spirit.—John 14:25, 26.

How comforting all of this is to true Christians today! Regardless of our circumstances and the trials that we may face, by following our Great Exemplar we will never be misled by wicked men, impostors, or Satan himself. Rather, with full faith we will rely on the support of Jehovah God and of his Son, who promised: “Look! I am with you all the days until the conclusion of the system of things.”—Matt. 28:20.

Showing Concern for the “Flock of God”

“Pay attention to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the holy spirit has appointed you overseers, to shepherd the congregation of God, which he purchased with the blood of his own Son.”—Acts 20:28.

1. How did Jesus Christ show great concern for those whom he likened to sheep?

NO ONE on earth ever showed greater concern for members of the human family than did Jesus Christ, the Great Exemplar. He referred to those who listened to his voice as his “sheep.” And, as the Fine Shepherd, he surrendered his soul or laid down his life in their behalf. (John 10:11, 27) Following his resurrection from the dead, Jesus impressed upon his apostle Simon Peter the need to give these “sheep” special attention. How did Jesus do this? In a way that truly motivated Peter throughout the rest of his earthly life.

2. (a) According to John 21:15-17, how did Peter react to the questions posed by his Master? (b) What did Jesus emphasize in this case? How?

2 Three times Jesus put a similar question to Peter. Twice, he asked: ‘Simon, do you love me?’ Finally, Jesus inquired: “Simon son of John, do you have affection for me?” After being asked virtually the same question the third time, Peter became grieved and emphatically assured his Lord: “You know all things; you are aware that I have affection for you.” Yes, Jesus was fully aware of Peter’s love and affection for him. But the point was that the apostle would have to prove this over a long period of time. How? By showing concern for the “sheep.” In each instance, after Peter had replied affirmatively to the question posed, Jesus intensified the point, saying: (1) “Feed my lambs”; (2) “Shepherd my little sheep”; (3) “Feed my little sheep.” (John 21:15-17) Thus, Jesus most effectively emphasized not only his personal concern for the “sheep” but Peter’s heavy future responsibility to care for them, even as his Lord had pointed out so emphatically.

3. (a) How did Peter give proof of his love for the “fine shepherd”? (b) What shows that Peter was not alone in showing concern for “the flock”?

3 That was an unforgettable experience for Peter. Unquestionably, Jesus had reached deep into the apostle’s heart. In proof of his love for the Fine Shepherd, Jesus Christ, never would Peter neglect to feed the “sheep.” Lovingly and conscientiously he would endeavor to shepherd “the flock.” About 30 years later, Peter wrote “to the temporary residents scattered about,” that is, to those who had become disciples of Jesus Christ. As part of the “flock of God” they were reminded of a deliverance from their previous fruitless form of conduct. How had this been accomplished? Not with a purchase based on such ordinary things as silver or gold, but “with precious blood, like that of an unblemished and spotless lamb, even Christ’s.” (1 Pet. 1:1, 18, 19) Peter appreciated that this had been a heavy price to pay. It had cost Jehovah God the sacrifice of his only-begotten Son, whom he had sent to this earth to provide a ransom for many. (Matt. 20:28; John 3:16) By the time Peter had written his first letter, the purchased members of “the flock” had grown to many thousands. So there then were more “sheep” than Peter could care for on his own. Along with Peter, however, other qualified men had been raised up who showed concern for “the flock” by feeding, leading and protecting it. They, too, appreciated that “the flock” belonged to Jehovah. And in our day this point is fully realized by the tens of thousands of spiritual undershepherds who have been given the responsibility of shepherding the “flock of God” in their care.

4. What fitting counsel on shepherding did Peter give when writing to older men in the Christian congregation?

4 When Peter was inspired to write his first letter, no doubt he could recall what Jesus had impressed upon his mind and heart with regard to shepherding the “sheep.” This is evident from the apostle’s words of exhortation directed not only to those first-century undershepherds but to spiritually older men among God’s people today. Peter wrote: “Therefore, to the older men among you I give this exhortation, for I too am an older man with them and a witness of the sufferings of the Christ, a sharer even of the glory that is to be revealed: Shepherd the flock of God in your care, not under compulsion, but willingly; neither for love of dishonest gain, but eagerly; neither as lording it over those who are God’s inheritance, but becoming examples to the flock. And when the chief shepherd has been made manifest, you will receive the unfadable crown of glory.”—1 Pet. 5:1-4.

Caring Lovingly for the “Flock of God”

5. (a) To be effective, what attitude should a Christian overseer have in order to fulfill his responsibility toward “the flock”? (b) Why can an overseer today view matters as Peter did?

5 As an eyewitness of the sufferings of the Christ, Peter was moved to emphasize the importance of showing concern for the “flock of God.” Just as the Chief Shepherd, Jesus Christ, demonstrated such concern, so it should be with all those shepherding “the flock.” But a Christian overseer certainly could not do this if he felt that he was serving under compulsion. No appointed elder today should feel that he must serve due to being put under pressure. While there is much work involved in shouldering this privileged responsibility, the loving undershepherd will display a desire to help and to be of service. But he will manifest that spirit only if he has the same mental attitude as that possessed by Christ Jesus, who displayed humility and willingness to endure suffering. (Phil. 2:5-8; 1 Pet. 4:1) If an elder recognizes himself to be part of “the flock” under the care of the Great Shepherd, Jehovah God, being accountable to Him and to the Fine Shepherd, Jesus Christ, and not to some human, then he will serve eagerly, uncomplainingly. (1 Pet. 2:25) Even though they have not been eyewitnesses of Jesus’ sufferings as Peter was, overseers today are favored with the detailed Bible accounts of Christ’s life and ministry. So they can view matters as Peter did and thus have the same spirit as that of the apostle when it comes to shepherding “the flock.”

6. What should overseers keep in mind when dealing with “the flock”?

6 To be a proper example, a Christian undershepherd must not be interested in dishonest or selfish gain, or in the attaining of undue prominence. Any ‘greatness’ involved comes from placing himself at the disposal of his brothers, being approachable, serving their spiritual interests. Knowing that “the flock” belongs to Jehovah, who purchased it with the blood of his Son, exemplary older men do not ‘lord it over those who are God’s inheritance.’ Rather, these undershepherds treat “the flock” tenderly and protectively, thus following the counsel and pattern furnished by the Fine Shepherd.—Matt. 20:25-27; Titus 1:7; contrast Ezekiel 34:2-4; Jude 16.

7. In what ways do many overseers show real concern for “the flock”?

7 It must truly be acknowledged that by far the majority of Christian overseers today are showing proper concern for “the flock” in a variety of ways. The time and effort spent in feeding the “sheep,” by giving personal attention to individuals, and in presiding at congregation meetings provide fine examples for fellow believers. (1 Tim. 5:17) Consider, too, the fine lead that conscientious undershepherds give in the field activity, seeking out other sheeplike persons and making disciples. (Matt. 28:19, 20; 2 Tim. 4:5) And what about the concern shown in protecting “the flock” from worldly elements and from those who would prey upon “the flock”? (Eph. 4:11-14; Col. 2:8; Jude 22, 23) In these and many other ways the “flock of God” benefits from those shepherding them out of loving concern for their spiritual welfare.

Valuable Lessons for Us Today

8. To provide spiritual encouragement, what did the apostle Paul arrange in behalf of the older men from Ephesus?

8 In reading Biblical accounts of what first-century overseers accomplished in behalf of “the flock,” we are impressed with the fine example of the apostle Paul. He also gave encouragement to older men, just as Peter did. While journeying to Jerusalem, Paul called for a meeting of the older men from Ephesus. No doubt they greatly appreciated the opportunity to spend some time with Paul, even as overseers today meet periodically to exchange helpful experiences, to be mutually built up in the faith and to receive Scriptural admonition.

9. How does the account at Acts 20:18-21 show that Paul was a self-sacrificing man of God?

9 We can learn some valuable lessons from Paul’s discussion with those overseers from Ephesus. The record at Acts 20:17-38 provides us with a deeper insight into the kind of example the apostle had set for his brothers, including those older men from Ephesus. Was Paul a self-sparing minister who just enjoyed traveling about to the various parts of the district of Asia? Not at all. He was a self-sacrificing man of God who was “slaving for the Lord with the greatest lowliness of mind and tears and trials” during the whole time that he was there. (Acts 20:18, 19) He did not hold back from “teaching . . . publicly and from house to house,” and that in the face of dangers. Nor was he fearful of what some residents of the community thought of him, or of the threats made by any opposers. Paul gave a thorough witness in the territory.—Acts 20:20, 21; compare Acts 19:1–20:1; 2 Corinthians 1:8-11.

Shepherding in Times of Persecution

10. How have many present-day overseers imitated Paul in their efforts to aid “the flock” despite personal suffering?

10 Now the apostle was heading for Jerusalem, undaunted by the prospect that “bonds and tribulations” were awaiting him there. He was prepared to lay down his life, if necessary, in order to finish his course in faithfulness and fulfill the ministry he had received from the Lord Jesus. (Acts 20:22-24) What a fine example that was for those Ephesian overseers! Paul’s concern was not only for those who needed to hear the “good news” but for the individuals bearing the responsibility to spread the message to others. Is this not the kind of concern that all appointed Christian elders should have today? Happily, we do have men who are imitating Paul in that they are willing to risk their very lives for the sake of the “good news” and to protect their brothers. Indeed, in lands where Christians suffer intense persecution, many faithful undershepherds loyally have stayed with “the flock,” even though the way may have opened up for these responsible men to go to countries where such sufferings apparently could have been avoided. To illustrate: Recently an elder who has already undergone years of imprisonment and cruel beatings visited the United States to receive training provided for the Watch Tower Society’s branch personnel. The opportunity was open to him to go to a country where there is at present no persecution. But he chose to return to the land in which he had been serving even though imprisonment and harsh persecution seemed certain for him there. Like so many other Christian undershepherds, he regards caring for “the flock” to be a privilege more precious than his own personal freedom. Truly, such overseers are to be commended. How fine that they continue to provide care for ‘sheep in distress’!—Compare Isaiah 32:1, 2.

11. (a) In view of Acts 20:25-27, what was Paul’s position regarding bloodguilt, and how can overseers today maintain a similar position? (b) Understandably, how do overseers feel toward persons whom they initially helped to become disciples?

11 It was among those who were now overseers in Ephesus that Paul had gone “preaching the kingdom.” They themselves had heard the message from his own lips. He had poured out his heart to them and others in declaring “all the counsel of God,” not his own ideas. So his conscience was clear. There would be no bloodguilt chargeable to his account for failing to give the witness. (Acts 20:25-27) So it should be with overseers in this time of trial, difficulty and hardship in finishing the work of giving a widespread Kingdom witness. Overseers today know that much depends on their zealous example in taking the lead in the work. For this reason, they endeavor to have as great a share as possible in declaring the “good news.” Thus they, too, keep clean and free of any bloodguilt. Others in the congregation observe that these elders take the lead in warning the wicked and searching out the honesthearted. Accordingly, such fellow believers are encouraged to follow their fine example. As in the case of those whom Paul helped, many today making up “the flock” are persons first contacted by overseers who were witnessing in their territory. Now that such individuals are in the congregation, the overseers show even greater concern for them.—1 Thess. 1:5, 6; 2:7, 8.

12. How are we to understand Paul’s statement at Acts 20:28?

12 Paul’s great concern for those older men from Ephesus, as well as for “the flock” in their care, is indicated by his words: “Pay attention to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the holy spirit has appointed you overseers, to shepherd the congregation of God, which he purchased with the blood of his own Son.” (Acts 20:28) Each one of those men surely felt the need to examine himself in view of the serious responsibility involved in shepherding “the flock.” Also, those overseers needed to apply Paul’s counsel to themselves as a body of older men. They had to cooperate and work together in caring for “the flock.” For best results, there had to be unity of thought and action on their part. This, in itself, would show that they had deep concern for “the flock.”

13. What can be said about the application of Acts 20:28 today?

13 How appropriate it is to use Paul’s admonition for the benefit of Christian older men today! Often, as when traveling overseers meet with congregation elders, those words recorded at Acts 20:28 have served as a basis for sound counsel. Let it be noted that what is said there does not mean paying attention only to oneself. Rather, the entire body of elders in each congregation has the responsibility of caring for the specific needs of “the flock.” This is true even though each elder may have a definite assignment that contributes toward this overall objective. Overseers must fulfill their shepherding responsibilities conscientiously and with loving concern, recognizing that “the flock” is precious to Jehovah in view of the price paid for its purchase.—Eph. 1:7.

Guarding Against Apostate “Wolves”

14. (a) What warning is found at Acts 20:29, 30? (b) Why was it timely for Paul to warn the Ephesian overseers?

14 Knowing what would develop after his death and that of the other apostles, Paul issued this warning: “I know that after my going away oppressive wolves will enter in among you and will not treat the flock with tenderness, and from among you yourselves men will rise and speak twisted things to draw away the disciples after themselves.” (Acts 20:29, 30) Later, the apostle Peter warned that there would be opportunists and promoters of sects preying upon the unwary, untaught and unsteady ones. (2 Pet. 2:1-3; 3:15, 16) As long as the apostles were present, they acted as a restraint against tendencies in that direction. But the Scriptures plainly foretold a major apostasy, and it did, in fact, eventuate. It still continues in the form of Christendom.—2 Thess. 2:6-10.

15. (a) Why should those now shepherding “the flock” be watchful? (b) At times, why is it necessary for elders to act on the direction given at Romans 16:17-19?

15 In this “time of the end” the Christian witnesses of Jehovah are pointedly warned against apostatizing or falling away. (Dan. 12:4; Matt. 24:9-13) Hence, faithful Christian undershepherds must show concern for “the flock” by being watchful. They should be alert so as to protect members of “the flock” from slipping into bad associations. (1 Cor. 15:33) Maintaining a healthy spiritual outlook and attitude is not easy in view of the constant pressures from the unclean world. That is why each person in the congregation should heed the admonition: “Remember those who are taking the lead among you, who have spoken the word of God to you, and as you contemplate how their conduct turns out imitate their faith.” (Heb. 13:7) At times older men may find it necessary to offer Scriptural counsel and to caution fellow believers against being influenced by those who seek their own selfish interests and pleasure rather than the spiritual good of “the flock” as a whole. The firm direction given by Paul at Romans 16:17-19 applies in such cases. He stated: “Now I exhort you, brothers, to keep your eye on those who cause divisions and occasions for stumbling contrary to the teaching that you have learned, and avoid them. For men of that sort are slaves, not of our Lord Christ, but of their own bellies; and by smooth talk and complimentary speech they seduce the hearts of guileless ones. For your obedience has come to the notice of all. I therefore rejoice over you. But I want you to be wise as to what is good, but innocent as to what is evil.”

Laboring in Behalf of “the Flock”

16. (a) What is indicated by the fact that Paul sometimes gave admonition with tears? (b) In showing concern, overseers today work diligently to do what for “the flock”?

16 Because Paul traveled extensively, he had a broad view of what was taking place in the congregations of his time. He knew that there were various problems and dangers. So it is understandable that he should urge the older men of Ephesus to keep awake spiritually. Over a period of three years Paul had demonstrated his love and concern by continuously admonishing them, even with tears. (Acts 20:31) Evidently there was an emotional strain involved in such shepherding. It took something out of Paul to render that watchful and loving attention. It is not surprising, therefore, that overseers today go through a similar experience at times, especially when there are serious problems to handle. (Compare 2 Corinthians 2:4.) In such situations their foremost concern is for “the flock.” They labor diligently to keep it spiritually clean and healthy, free from leaven.—1 Cor. 5:6; Gal. 5:7-10; Titus 2:1.

17. (a) What important point should be learned from Paul’s words at Acts 20:32? (b) Committing persons and their interests to Jehovah allows for what outcome?

17 In committing the Ephesian overseers “to God and to the word of his undeserved kindness,” Paul could feel confident that they were in the best of hands. (Acts 20:32) Likewise today, after overseers have done all that they can in giving counsel and help, or in taking whatever other disciplinary action is Scripturally advisable, they can leave matters in God’s hands. In situations where our dear brothers and sisters in the faith are beset by serious problems, it is always comforting to know that by committing them and their interests to Jehovah in prayer and letting his Word, spirit and organization provide the needed direction, the outcome will be according to his will. Under those circumstances, whatever occurs will be by God’s permission. (Compare 1 Peter 2:23.) Again, this shows concern for “the flock,” for it turns attention to the One who can do the most good in every situation.

18. (a) What was Paul’s view concerning his material provisions? (b) By imitating Paul’s example in this, how do overseers show concern for “the flock”?

18 With a clear conscience, Paul could point to the evidence that he had not sought to enrich himself at the expense of his brothers. He had worked with his own hands and thus had the satisfaction of caring for his necessities. (Acts 20:33, 34) True, when in need he did accept something from the Philippian Christians. He did not seek such gifts, but, rather, the fruitage that is associated with such giving. (Phil. 4:14-17) As Paul was industrious and did not serve for dishonest gain, so overseers of our day can set a fine example by showing that they are not lazy, or that they are not seeking to avoid hard work. Their concern for “the flock” prevents them from becoming a burden on the congregation.—2 Thess. 3:6-10.

19. Acting in harmony with the principle stated at Acts 20:35 has what effect on overseers and the congregation as a whole?

19 Having noted what Paul had exhibited in his own life and service, those Ephesian overseers had something to go by as they endeavored to assist the weak and to give of themselves in building up the congregation. Acting in harmony with the principle that “there is more happiness in giving than there is in receiving,” present-day Christian overseers furnish a fine example for others. (Acts 20:35) Indeed, they not only give much but are giving unstintingly. Their continuing to do so contributes to the happiness of all in the congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

“Anxiety for All the Congregations”

20. To what extent were Peter and Paul concerned with “the flock”?

20 It is obvious that the fine examples provided by such faithful apostles as Peter and Paul were outstanding. They expended themselves in behalf of fellow Christians and showed deep concern not just for one congregation but for the whole association of their brothers. (1 Pet. 2:17) Despite many inconveniences, problems and trials, the apostles kept the spiritual welfare of “the flock” uppermost in mind.

21. (a) According to 2 Corinthians 11:23-28, what were some of “those things of an external kind” that Paul experienced? (b) How did Paul show his deep concern for others?

21 In writing to fellow believers at Corinth, Paul cited beatings, imprisonments, trying experiences and various dangers that he had encountered in serving as a minister. The apostle then added: “Besides those things of an external kind, there is what rushes in on me from day to day, the anxiety for all the congregations.” (2 Cor. 11:23-28) We can only imagine the pressures Paul had and the concern he felt for “all the congregations,” for he kept in touch with a number of Christian associates. (2 Tim. 4:9-13) He traveled extensively in the course of his missionary tours and made a number of return visits to the congregations. (Acts 15:36) His activities in behalf of others were demanding indeed. He gave talks for extended periods and regularly witnessed in synagogues, public places and from house to house. (Acts 17:2; 19:9, 10; 20:20) To care for his material needs and to avoid burdening the congregation, it was necessary for Paul to engage in secular work. (Acts 18:1-3; 2 Thess. 3:8, 9) Obviously, the apostle also spent considerable time studying God’s Word, and the knowledge thus acquired doubtless served him well when he was divinely inspired to write some 14 of the 27 books comprising the Christian Greek Scriptures. Truly, Paul was a very busy man, but he carried on, always displaying great concern for “the flock.”

22, 23. (a) In our time, what are some ways in which provision is made for the “flock of God”? (b) All these provisions furnish evidence of what, and how should we be affected thereby?

22 There is a vast amount of work being done today in behalf of the “flock of God.” With over 42,000 congregations of Jehovah’s people, think of the attention that must be given to their needs. A regular flow of spiritual food is being provided by the “faithful and discreet slave.” (Matt. 24:45-47) Programs for congregation meetings, circuit assemblies and district conventions are arranged regularly to enable Christians to come together for spiritually upbuilding study, worship and association. (Heb. 10:23-25) Traveling overseers are sent to visit and care for the special needs of all the congregations (Compare Acts 16:4, 5.) Communications containing counsel and encouragement are sent to congregations and bodies of elders. (Compare Philippians 1:1; 1 Peter 5:12; Jude 3.) Other arrangements, too numerous to mention, are made to benefit the “flock of God” spiritually and otherwise.

23 This work involves a tremendous amount of time, effort and expense. But of what is it an evidence? It shows that Jehovah cares for his people. Through his Son, the Fine Shepherd, God demonstrates superb shepherding ability. (Isa. 40:10, 11) Tens of thousands of undershepherds have been appointed by holy spirit and they are sharing in shepherding the “flock of God.” All of this shows loving concern for “the flock” as a whole and for the individuals that make up “the flock.” May we personally display heartfelt appreciation for the love shown by the Great Shepherd, Jehovah God, and his Son, Jesus Christ, in all their tender care for us.

[Picture on page 14]

“Feed My Little Sheep”

Overseers—Be Fine Examples to “the Flock”

“Become an example to the faithful ones in speaking, in conduct, in love, in faith, in chasteness.”—1 Tim. 4:12.

1. Why should we expect Christian overseers to set a fine example?

MUCH is involved in serving as an overseer in the Christian congregation. This fact is recognized by thousands of dedicated, spiritual men who are entrusted with this privilege today. Since all individuals in the congregation are Christian brothers and sisters, appointed elders know that their responsibility does not make them any better than other worshipers of Jehovah. (Matt. 23:8-12) Yet, in view of their responsibilities and the Scriptural requirements they must meet, more is expected of them. It is even as Jesus said: “Indeed, everyone to whom much was given, much will be demanded of him; and the one whom people put in charge of much, they will demand more than usual of him.” (Luke 12:48) “The flock” is greatly affected by what these undershepherds say and do. It is expected, therefore, that these men would set a fine example for others.

…

Refine Search

Index Downloading...

The Watchtower, September 1, 1980