Awake!, June 22, 1973

Download: PDF — Awake!, June 22, 1973

Awake! — June 22, 1973

Source: jw.org

Contents

Millions Ask: “What Are We to Eat?”

Reasons Why So Many Go Hungry

Modern Famine—Its Root Cause and Lasting Solution

The Flooding Mississippi Upsets America’s Breadbasket

How Long Could You Survive in Deep Water?

An Unexpected Blessing from Maintaining Self-Control

Watchtower Farm—Unique in Many Ways

The Boom in Bikes—What’s Behind It?

Why Are Some Born Handicapped?

Watching the World

Is the Bible Just Another Book?

Will You Be There?

Millions Ask: “What Are We to Eat?”

A VILLAGE farmer left a drought-ravaged field in India to bring his only bullock to market for sale. What did he get in exchange for the animal? Twelve bananas! This man, like millions of others in India, is hungry!

Not just in India, but throughout the rest of Asia, much of Africa and other parts of the world, large portions of the population are asking: “What are we to eat?”

So critical is the situation that some experts predict international famine conditions within months.

The Famine That Was ‘Not Supposed to Happen’

It is true that certain places, like India, are known for their periodic famines. But the current food shortage is distinctive. A fifty-year-old Indian government clerk says: “This is the worst I have ever seen in my lifetime.” Aggravating this famine is the fact that it was ‘not supposed to happen.’ But were there not warnings several years ago of such coming famine?

Yes, there were. In fact, the book Famine—1975 (published in 1967) quoted Dr. R. Ewell as predicting: “The world is on the threshold of the biggest famine in history. If present trends continue, it seems likely that famine will reach serious proportions in India, Pakistan and China early in the 1970’s. . . . Such a famine will be of massive proportions affecting hundreds of millions.”

This and similar warnings were quite well known among food experts. But something happened to silence temporarily such dire predictions.

In the mid-sixties the so-called “green revolution” was started with great fanfare. Special high-yielding types of wheat and rice were developed, and these bolstered hopes that hunger was about to be “conquered.” The voices predicting famine were muffled.

However, now the hope of the “green revolution” appears hollow. Says the New York Times: “Asia’s Green Revolution, which promised a new era in food production and an end to famine forever, suffered a severe setback in 1972.” It also noted editorially: “The great promise of the green revolution, which was never as green as it was sometimes pictured, appears to be fading.”

Food Supplies Shrivel in Asia and Africa

Yes, a few months back the “green revolution” seemed a glowing success, a triumph for technology. After the 1971 season, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi felt confident enough to declare that India would not be importing more grain.

But in less than a year that country has gone from a record surplus to a national food crisis. In one state 50 percent of last year’s corn plantings died; only 30 percent of the rice could even be planted. The entire national grain harvest fell about 60 percent below normal. Men are compelled to work long stretches without food. And matters are predicted to worsen—but not only in India.

Recent famine conditions in Afghanistan have been “only partially reported to the outside world,” says the South China Morning Post. People in Afghanistan have been forced to leave their villages and have been reduced to eating grass and roots. Some have sold their work animals, land and even the roof timbers from their houses to buy whatever food is available. It has been reported that tens of thousands have died.

Reports of food shortage also come from the Asian countries of Indonesia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Cambodia, Laos and Turkey. Drops in crop production occurred in South Korea and Thailand.

Russia and China also have suffered recent grain setbacks. “The Soviet Union had its worst harvest in a century,” said Canada’s Spectator regarding the 1972 season. Russia was compelled to buy almost $2,000,000,000 worth of “urgently needed” foreign grain, mostly from the United States. There was also a decline in potato and vegetable production. The huge Russian shortages brought problems for the whole economy and led to the replacement of their agriculture minister.

China’s grain production was down in 1972, as were yields of cotton, sesame and peanuts. It is one of the few times that they have officially acknowledged grain production losses since the Communists came to power in 1949.

Africa has also been affected by severe food shortage. The Rhodesian farmers’ union refers to the 50-percent drop in crop production as a “national tragedy.” The situation in Mauritania is called “extremely serious.” Estimates there say that perhaps 80 percent of the cattle have died; grain production is only one fifth its normal level.

Crop losses to farmers in South Africa were over $320 million by early 1973. Mali, Chad, and Upper Volta, the countries just below the Sahara Desert, are the hardest hit. But Zambia, Botswana, Swaziland, Central African Republic, Senegal, Dahomey, Cameroon and Nigeria are also feeling the effects of limited food. Reports of food shortages are also coming from islands of the sea and South and Central America.

Yes, ‘the world is on the threshold of famine,’ warns Dr. Boerma, director general of the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (F.A.O.). In February 1973 he advised that any country needing help should ‘make arrangements now’ with other countries.

But can other countries continue indefinitely to help? What are the conditions in the nations that are known for their high agricultural productivity?

How Much Food in Other Places

What of the United States? Although not hit by major crop failure, it now has within its borders over twenty-five million persons who do not enjoy what is officially called a “decent standard of living”—in other words, they are poor and often hungry.

At the same time U.S. food prices continue to rise! In 1972, retail food prices were up 4.8 percent in the U.S. over the previous year; they are predicted to rise 6 percent in 1973. Meanwhile food prices soared 8.6 percent in neighboring Canada during 1972.

These price hikes are directly affected by the amount of food available. The greater the demand for existing supplies the higher the prices. Thus in the United States during 1972 the price of “number two hard wheat” rose over 61 percent per bushel, largely due to Soviet demands on the existing supply. Now, as the accompanying chart shows, U.S. reserves have vanished.

Last year’s Australian wheat crop was less than one half of the expected yield as that continent suffered severe drought. Argentina’s 1971 wheat harvest was described as “disappointing.” The surpluses of Burma (sometimes called ‘the rice bowl of southeast Asia’) are now very limited.

Understandably, more and more experts are reaching the conclusion that the few agriculturally rich nations cannot indefinitely feed the rest of the world. Back in 1969 Harvard University’s R. O. Greep noted:

“A factor of critical importance to the world situation is that the food reserves in countries with heavy agricultural production, such as the United States, Canada, Australia, and Argentina, are rapidly being depleted . . . To those who are in a position to sense the future situation, there is mounting apprehension. . . . The problem will be particularly acute in the United States, since we are looked upon as the principal supplier of grain . . . When famine strikes and the food source no longer suffices, then we shall have to face the awful question of who shall survive.”

In 1973 when a Canadian wheat official was asked about continuing to supply the world, he answered: “You cannot sell or give what you do not have.”

The food crisis that the whole human race faces is real. Can it be solved? To answer that question we must first determine why famine now stalks mankind.

[Chart on page 4]

(For fully formatted text, see publication)

FOOD PRICES

1971 1973

25¢ a pound 55¢ a pound

79¢ a pound 99¢ a pound

45¢ a dozen 72¢ a dozen

[Graph on page 5]

(For fully formatted text, see publication)

The U.S. Grain Reserves HAVE VANISHED

1963 1969 1973

2,299 MILLION BUSHELS 569 MILLION BUSHELS SUPPLIES EXHAUSTED

Reasons Why So Many Go Hungry

“EVERY day, nearly 2 billion people wake up to face a world in which their lives will be dominated by a single desire . . . for food,” observes L. R. Brown of the Overseas Development Council. Millions of persons need more or better food. Is the earth to blame for man’s lack in this respect?

No; the earth appears capable of supporting billions more persons than the present 3.7 billion who now populate it. Some authorities say there is twice as much arable land available for cultivation as what has been used in recent decades.

Unpredictable Weather Aggravates Food Shortages

But one major factor that greatly limits the amount of yield that can come from even excellent soil is weather: “No answer,” says a Newsweek article, “has yet been found to the whims of the weather.”

Much of the famine situation in Asia and Africa was brought on by drought. Monsoon rains in 1972 were too limited or too late to benefit India’s summer crops. Rains in Bangladesh were 40 percent below normal during the growing months. The weather’s irregularities also dangerously affected production in the Philippines. In the north, the rice crop was ruined by the worst floods of the century; while in the south, crop yields were limited by drought.

Russia, on the other hand, has suffered large grain losses in the last two years because of receiving only light snow cover during the winter; grain crops were thus left to suffer frost damage. In China, the Hsinhua press agency says that not only drought, floods and frost, but also windstorms, hail and insects devastated many of their crops. The world’s current food crisis should realistically remind man of his weakness before the natural elements.

The uncertainties of weather have largely canceled out the effects of the “green revolution.” It is feared, however, that the “green revolution’s” limited success may be even further curtailed. Why?

Because when a large area is planted with a single grain crop it is vulnerable to affliction by a single devastating plant disease. Similarly, insects that thrive on one variety of grain can wipe out a whole crop. Indeed, a local joke in Pakistan says that ‘the new miracle wheat has given rise to a new miracle locust!’

Technology Fails to Solve Food Shortage

While control of the natural elements is out of man’s hands, what about technology? Although it has developed techniques and equipment that are valuable, it has also done much to contribute to the current food shortage. ‘Urban sprawl’ gobbles up much fine farmland as man’s cities grow. Industrial pollution and wrong use of commercial fertilizers have greatly lessened the fertility of countless acres.

Further, much agricultural research today, while centering on “cash crops,” is oblivious to the real food crops of poorer nations. An article in BioScience magazine points out that the world’s food problem persists largely in the tropics. Nevertheless, most scientific study is on crops that thrive, not in the tropics, but in the temperate zones.

Modern technology has not, therefore, solved the overall food shortage. In fact, in some respects it has contributed to the current crisis. Other factors, also of man’s making, have likewise seriously aggravated food shortage.

Politics and Hunger

Man’s political wars—not ‘natural causes’—can be blamed for the suffering from food shortage right now in places like Cambodia and Bangladesh. Agricultural systems, grain and water supplies, as well as draft animals, have been destroyed by war.

As a result, there have been food riots and looting, as in Phnom Penh, capital of Cambodia. Soldiers guarding bridges have assessed “black taxes” on trucks carrying produce into that city, doubling the price of food; prices have trebled in other places in Cambodia.

In Bangladesh, food cannot get into ports that have been blocked by mines or sunken vessels; many bridges in that country are still not usable. Through last October, of $1,000,000,000 in relief funds sent to Bangladesh, only one third was used for food. The remainder was needed to restore the nation’s transportation and communication systems.

The political system itself often cripples efforts at fighting famine. Notes Newsweek:

“In Indonesia, bureaucrats are the problem. Under a typical Indonesian system called abs asal asal bapak senang (as long as the father is happy), agriculture officials not only failed to report the bad news of production setbacks to President Suharto but also failed to build up the government’s stockpile of rice.”

Similarly, Economic and Political Weekly of Bombay, India, admits:

“The pattern by now is wearily familiar; the complaisant officials tell the junior ministers what they want to hear, the junior ministers tell the senior ministers what they want to hear and so on till the chain ends with the Prime Minister.”

Religion and the Famine

Religion, too, often contributes to the food problem. Consider an example.

Seventy-three people live in the village of Nazrichawk in the Indian state of Bihar. The soil there is described as “good.” Further, after the last drought, in 1967, an effective irrigation system was set up. Today, however, the diesel pump operating the irrigation system is rust-coated and the people go hungry! Yet they can afford to get the pump fixed. Then why does it stay in disrepair? Answers Natural History magazine:

“The problem is that the necessary work projects would require a group effort: to develop schemes any more sophisticated than a bullock-drawn waterwheel demands consensus on such issues as water distribution, financing and labor. Such common needs, however, rarely unify a community divided by religion, caste, and politics. . . . A multitude of small, caste-oriented political parties are active throughout the state, and their activities further fragmentize the villages. Instead of being a community, a village often disintegrates into hostile factions splintered along religious, political, and caste lines.”—January 1973, pages 34 and 35.

Yes, people starve because religion and other social forces divide them! But there is another way in which some religions affect the food problem adversely.

Certain religions discourage small families; yet more births mean more mouths to feed. Already India alone has 550 million people. Each year that country increases by another twelve to thirteen million people. That is the equivalent of the entire population of the continent of Australia! Though the Indian government seems to have earnestly tried to encourage smaller families, its success has been limited—by religion.

As a case in point: Recent figures show that in the last decade the number of Hindus increased by only 24 percent, while the number of Moslems was up 31 percent. On learning this, what did Hindu religious leaders do? Bombay journalist A. S. Abraham says they “lost no time in using these statistics to buttress their repeated appeals to Hindus not to practice family planning for fear of becoming a minority in their own country. They simply ignored the fact that Hindus constitute 82 percent of the population, while Moslems account for roughly 12 percent.” Such religious leaders do much to nullify the government’s efforts at controlling population.

Furthermore, most Indians readily comply with the wishes of their religious leaders. Why? Because to them children are a form of wealth. Farmers, for instance, use their children to ‘look after the goats.’ Too, parents want children who will take care of them in their old age. Many Asian children die early in life; thus the more offspring one has, parents reason, the greater the likelihood that some of them will survive until the parents’ old age.

Opposition to government programs for birth control comes not only from ‘Eastern religions.’ Christendom, too, is a source of stiff opposition.

In 1930 Pope Pius XI summarized the official Catholic position on birth control in his encyclical Casti connubii. He called most birth-control methods “an offense against the law of God and of nature, and those who indulge in such are branded with the guilt of a grave sin.” Popes since then have reaffirmed this belief.

The current pope, Paul VI, told a United Nations audience in October 1965 that “artificial control of birth” is “irrational.” Then, in July 1968, he issued his own encyclical on the subject, Humanae Vitae. By mid-1970, just two years later, the population of Catholic South America had increased by another ten million persons, or about twice the number of people living in the entire nation of Bolivia! Yet, since 1944, food production per person has been decreasing more in Latin America than in any other part of the world.

So-called Christian religious leaders should be aware of the truth stated by the Christian apostle Paul: “If anyone does not provide for his own relatives and especially for members of his immediate family, he has denied the faith; he is worse than an unbeliever.” (1 Timothy 5:8, in the Catholic New American Bible) The size of one’s family is, of course, a personal matter. Nevertheless, should parents be encouraged to bear so many children that they cannot “provide for” them, leaving them to go hungry? Obviously not.

Some of the world’s largest religions, therefore, must share the responsibility for earth’s bulging population and food crisis.

There are yet other factors that contribute to famine conditions, factors that are difficult for well-fed persons from ‘rich nations’ to appreciate fully.

Effects of Malnutrition

One of these is the adverse physical effect of malnutrition. Hungry people often cannot provide food for themselves. They are prone to disease, since natural immunity vanishes with poor diet. Persons with wasted legs and who cannot walk because of malnutrition can be seen in many countries. How much heavy work can such persons do on farmland?

Mentally, too, people are affected by malnutrition. What may at first appear to a visitor as a natural ‘calm’ in some nations is often the tiredness, aimlessness and complacency brought on by a poor diet. Arthur Hopcraft says about one country in his book Born to Hunger: “I saw very little playfulness among children; hardly any games being played. The prevailing frailty and dullness of the children is one of the most affecting aspects of everyday life.” Can dispirited, weakened persons be expected to respond vigorously to the challenge of providing ample food for their families? They are obviously limited in what they can accomplish.

Unfortunately, too, people from richer nations often fail to realize that, while persons reared in an altogether different culture generally think differently than they themselves do, this does not necessarily mean that they are backward or inferior. Yet men considered dedicated to solving world food problems may regard themselves as superior to the natives of a foreign land. This limits their effectiveness. It is one more reason why the world still has a food crisis. Says Cornell University’s H. D. Thurston:

“The ability to meet one’s hosts and treat them as equals and coworkers often is more important than one’s scientific knowledge. . . . Even the poorest farmer and laborer often has great pride and human dignity. The least suggestion of inferiority will be resented and may ruin all one’s future work.”

Yet, the humility needed to solve this system’s international food problems is not readily found.

The food shortage, therefore, runs much deeper than merely the right combination of soil and weather. Man’s political, technological and religious activities and social attitudes, as well as his lack of humane consideration, have unquestionably complicated the problem beyond the ability of imperfect men to solve.

We today, as a consequence, are witnessing a worldwide paradox. Just consider: man now has the technical ‘know-how’ for producing abundant crops by using vast irrigation and storage systems. He has schools to teach sophisticated agricultural techniques. There is impressive farming equipment to cultivate huge areas of land. An international F.A.O. keeps men informed about the food situation everywhere, and fast communications advise them where supplies are necessary. Rapid transportation systems can speed food to where it is needed. Nevertheless, thousands of people still die EVERY DAY from starvation.

Why now, at this time, does this paradoxical situation exist? There must be a reason. And, just as importantly, is there a sure solution to the world’s food crisis?

[Picture on page 7]

Irregularities of weather and other problems have greatly reduced the effects of the “green revolution”

[Picture on page 8]

LEADERS OF PROMINENT RELIGIONS ENCOURAGE LARGE FAMILIES—EVEN IN POOR COUNTRIES!

‘Hindus must not become a minority’—Hindu Leaders in India

‘Birth control is irrational’—Pope Paul VI

‘What are we to eat?’

Modern Famine—Its Root Cause and Lasting Solution

DOES it not seem incredible that, with such seemingly favorable advances, man’s progress in feeding earth’s population is all but canceled out? Many factors, as we have seen, contribute to this. But why is it occurring now? To answer that we must go back to World War I, which started in 1914. But why go back almost sixty years?

Because that year marked what an American newspaper called “the beginning of most of our present international troubles.” How so? Because the divisive spirit of nationalism took hold on mankind to an extent without precedent. This led to further distress. Historians say—and many other persons still living can verify—that World War I brought in its wake one of the most terrible famines of history, taking in most of Europe and Russia. The war ruined fields in vast areas. Transportation systems were disrupted. The horrible effects of resulting famine contributed, in turn, to another devastating holocaust—World War II.

“It must be remembered,” observes the book 1918, “that the road for those [World War II European] dictators was cleared largely by what the people of those countries went through in the terrible winter after [World War I].”

The second world war repeated the cycle—but on a greater scale. A former U.S. surgeon general tells us: “After World War II, there occurred the greatest worldwide shortage of food in history.” And since that time, yes, right down to this moment, there have been countless smaller wars and revolutions, triggered by nationalism and producing more starvation. Nor is it simply by disrupting agriculture and shipping that the wars since 1914 have produced famine.

They have intensified the spirit of nationalism. Wedges have been driven between nations of men, separating and antagonizing them. As a result, when a nation has bountiful crops does it share readily with poorer nations? If it appears to be politically advantageous, yes. But the richer one may also be paying its farmers not to grow food, even though thousands of people who live in other nations are known to suffer malnutrition!

Yes, for these reasons—all of which are the fruits of nationalism—man’s technical advances in farming methods have all but been canceled out.

How the Bible Predicted Modern Famine

Most significantly, the famine situation we see now was foretold in Bible prophecy for this very time period since 1914. Consider what the prophet’s vision at Revelation 6:4-8 describes:

“And [there] came forth, a fiery-colored horse, and to the one seated upon it there was granted to take peace away from the earth so that they should slaughter one another, and a great sword was given him. . . .

“And I saw, and, look! a black horse, and the one seated upon it had a pair of scales in his hand. And I heard a voice . . . say: ‘A quart of wheat for a day’s wage, and three quarts of barley for a day’s wage; and do not harm the olive oil and the wine.’ . . .

“And I saw, and, look! a pale horse, and the one seated upon it had the name Death. And Hades [the grave] was closely following him. And authority was given them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with a long sword and with food shortage and with deadly plague and by the wild beasts of the earth.”—“New World Translation,” 1950 ed.

Is this not an accurate picture of how war, followed by famine and plague have ridden across the earth since 1914? But, it might be asked, has not this cycle of war followed by plague and famine always existed? The basic pattern is not new. But the scale of these conditions here described is out of the ordinary. The figurative phrase “the fourth part of the earth” shows that the Bible is referring to a large fraction of the whole earth. That has certainly been fulfilled, as never before, since 1914. But can we know for sure that those words in Revelation definitely apply since that date?

We are assisted in this by identifying the first horseman, concerning whom the Revelation says:

“And I saw, and, look! a white horse; and the one seated upon it had a bow; and a crown was given him, and he went forth conquering and to complete his conquest.”—Rev. 6:2.

Other texts, including those from Revelation itself (Re 19:11-13), identify the one seated on the “white horse” as Jesus Christ. Since he was ‘given a crown,’ this account must refer to the time when Jesus would begin to rule as king over the earth. He would then, as it were, start to ‘conquer’ his enemies. To whom would he give attention first?

To his closest enemies, the invisible Satan and his demon angels. They were ousted from heaven to earth. The results were: “Woe for the earth . . . because the Devil has come down to you, having great anger, knowing he has a short period of time.” (Rev. 12:12) What form of expression would this “woe” take?

This is revealed in answers that Jesus gave to his disciples. Interested in his future rule, they asked him: “What will be the sign of your presence and of the conclusion of the system of things?” Jesus then foretold visible evidences that would take place on earth to signify that he was ‘present,’ actually ruling from the heavens. Within the space of ‘one generation,’ he predicted, many things would occur before he completely destroyed this system of things. Notice what Jesus said was included in the evidence to be looked for:

“Nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be food shortages and earthquakes in one place after another. All these things are a beginning of pangs of distress.”—Matt. 24:3, 7, 8, 34.

Jesus said that when he started to rule there would be war. The book of Revelation indicates that this would be world war, because it says that the second horseman with his “great sword” ‘takes peace away from [not just a few nations, but] the earth.’ The first such world war began in 1914. Afterward would come global food shortage and high food prices. Revelation shows that, not just the poor, but even the wealthy would feel the effects of limited food supplies. The prophecy warns them not to draw too heavily on their supplies of ‘olive oil and wine.’ (Rev. 6:5, 6) All of this is part of the “woe for the earth” clearly marking our period since 1914 as the “time of the end” for this present corrupt system of things.—Rev. 12:12.

Proper Attitude When Suffering from Hunger

Those who live in areas where food may be restricted today can particularly see the reality of Jesus’ words. Unfortunately, many of such people have become embittered by these conditions and turn from God. How much more discerning, though, is the person who sees in these events the fulfillment of God’s Word!

God’s true servants know from experience that he cares for all who genuinely ‘seek first His kingdom.’ (Matt. 6:33) This does not mean that God will never allow his own people to pass through temporary suffering, even hunger. Even the faithful Christian apostle Paul said that in his intense ministry he experienced “hunger and thirst.” Yet he was confident that nothing, including hunger, could cause him to become separated from God’s love in Christ. (2 Cor. 11:27; Rom. 8:35-39; Phil. 4:11-13) The apostle was sure, too, that even if God should allow him to die he had the promise of a resurrection.—Acts 24:15.

So, in our time, rather than give out because famine strikes, do as Jesus advised: “Raise yourselves erect.” Why? “Because your deliverance is getting near.” (Luke 21:28) Be assured that, since the part of God’s Word predicting food shortages for our time is coming true, the rest of his promises will also become reality.

This means that God’s new order is near at hand. After the King Jesus Christ completes his ‘conquest’ of the present wicked system of things, righteousness will prevail everywhere. No more will there be divisive nationalism, corrupt politics and selfish commercial elements to oppress the people. Under the kingdom of God, this earth will be made a delightful place in which to live. God promises that he will “wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore.” Food shortage and malnutrition will become never-to-be-repeated things of the past. Man is not in position to bring such a thing about, but God is, and he has given his sure word of promise that he will do so.—Rev. 21:3-5; 16:14, 16.

Avoiding Excesses

It is not just impoverished people that need to keep a clear vision of God’s new order. As recorded at Luke 21:34, 35, Jesus warned those who were not in extreme poverty: “Pay attention to yourselves that your hearts never become weighed down with overeating and heavy drinking and anxieties of life, and suddenly that day be instantly upon you as a snare. For it will come in upon all those dwelling upon the face of all the earth.”

Therefore, those in ‘rich nations’ who, for now, still have more than a sufficiency of food, must be careful not to center their affections on material prosperity. Doing so would mean failure to appreciate the significance of our times. Rather, each person who would live in God’s new system must learn now how to put Jehovah’s worship first in his life.

Just think about it: a marvelous new order is near at hand. God himself, the Creator of heaven and earth, has promised that soon all earth’s goodness, including the bountiful food it can supply, will be used for the benefit of all righteous men and to the glory of God. The present selfish world society, favoring a minority of well-fed people and slighting the needs of the majority of poor, hungry ones, will be gone forever. In its place Jehovah “will certainly make for all the peoples . . . a banquet of well-oiled dishes, a banquet of wine kept on the dregs, of well-oiled dishes filled with marrow, of wine kept on the dregs, filtered.”—Isa. 25:6.

Does life under such conditions, in a world where righteousness controls, appeal to you? If so, now is the time to inform yourself about the prospects and to learn what is required in order to attain it. Jehovah’s witnesses will be glad to assist you, free of charge. Invite them to visit you, at a convenient time, to discuss these prospects.

The Flooding Mississippi Upsets America’s Breadbasket

ONE of the major floods of American history has struck the Mississippi River and its tributaries.

For the Mississippi to reach flood stage at springtime is not unusual. Its system of tributaries drains the vast, well-watered, fertile plains stretching all the way from the Rocky Mountains to the Appalachian range. Nevertheless, this year’s flood is different, seriously different.

It has completely upset what might be called ‘the breadbasket of America.’ Large quantities of grain, vegetables, meat and dairy products have poured from this region for generations. The year 1973 was earlier predicted to be the largest harvest year in its history.

But not now. How did it happen? What exactly does it mean for you?

Cause of the Flood

A peculiar weather pattern set the river on its record-breaking swell. Starting last October, a superabundance of rain showered down on the U.S. south and midwest.

In March the state of Mississippi alone registered a 218-percent increase in rainfall over the same month a year earlier. Memphis, Tennessee, had rain on 65 of the first 106 days of the year.

The Mississippi River slowly rose and reached record heights in several places. In April it broke a two-hundred-year-old record at St. Louis when it crested at over forty-three feet.

But not just size made this year’s flood different. A spokesman for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers says: “This year’s flood has given us a long sustained high water period rather than a quick peak and fall.” Damage during this long flooding has been widespread.

Extent of the Immediate Damage

In place after place along the river and its tributaries homes and farm buildings were totally covered with floodwaters. Earth-mound levees and dikes washed away. Whole cities—like Cairo, Illinois—looked like islands set apart by a sea of rolling muddy water. Understandably, one veteran of many Mississippi rampages calls the 1973 flood “the granddaddy of them all.”

So far, property damage from the flood has been calculated to be at least 500 million dollars. Over twenty persons have died, some 35,000 have been driven from their homes. Figures as to how much land was actually inundated vary from eleven to over twenty million acres.

What is surprising is that the huge amounts of water did not cause more damage than they did. Why was this?

Why Damage Was Not Greater

The Mississippi flood-control system constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Mississippi River Commission functioned well, apparently without a single break. In May, a Commission spokesman estimated that damage without the project would have been fourteen times as great.

This 2,000-mile-long flood-control system was begun along the Mississippi after the record flood of 1927, in which over 300 persons perished. It has cost over one million dollars per mile to construct. When the Mississippi River outgrows its normal banks this system keeps the river within a man-made channel.

However, the 1973 success of the flood-control network also seems to have created at least part of the flooding, but in other areas. The Mississippi became so full of water that no more could pour into it. Water, as a consequence, backed up along the tributaries. State, county and private levees, unable to handle the overload, broke and flooded the surrounding land.

Of course, the federal levee system would not have functioned without hardworking people to take care of it. They, too, helped to keep damage down. Holes in the system, for example, had to be plugged in emergency measures. Near the small town of Nairn, Louisiana, work crews braced a weakening levee by dumping more than 300 junked automobiles and thousands of tons of rock into it.

Volunteers all along the river and its tributaries also responded to countless calls to fill millions of sandbags for temporary dikes restraining the water. Other volunteers, young and old, labored long hours, often without food or sleep, alongside National Guardsmen and Marines in rescue operations or trying to save homes or prominent buildings from the water.

Many lives were also spared because of orderly evacuations of people from endangered areas. In addition to caring for their own families, elders in the congregations of Jehovah’s witnesses saw to it that fellow Witnesses were safe.

Thus, at Morgan City, Louisiana, it was learned that nearby floodgates might be opened to release pressure on a weak dam, flooding the basin where they lived. The presiding overseer tells what action the elders took:

“About two weeks before the gates were opened, the elders, anticipating this possibility, met with their assistants and other concerned brothers to discuss evacuation plans and made transportation assignments for the nearly one-third of the congregation that did not have automobiles. Each neighborhood study conductor and his assistant were to aid those in their own group to evacuate.”

On Tuesday morning, April 17, the floodgates were opened. Rains had also started again the day before. Flash flooding occurred all over Morgan City. The congregation went ahead with the celebration of the Lord’s Evening Meal after 6 p.m. But thereafter, they executed their evacuation plans.

Most of the Witnesses were then cared for in the homes of members of the nearby Lafayette congregation. Baton Rouge congregations sent financial aid to Lafayette to help with expenses.

Among the most devastating damage caused by the flood was the upset to farmland. This damage will have long-range consequences.

Long-Range Effects on America’s Breadbasket

So serious is the situation that the Memphis (Tennessee) Press-Scimitar says: “Agriculture officials warn of crop famine possibilities.”

The rains and flooding dealt farmers a ‘double-barreled’ blow. Last fall’s rain meant that the harvest could not be completed. Now, this year, farmers have been too busy fighting the water to plant crops.

Just how much yield will the farmer get this year? The precise amount, of course, remains to be seen. Yet, consider:

Corn should be planted during May. But fields were still under several feet of water at mid-month. Only about one percent of Missouri’s corn was in the ground in early May. An observer says: “It is a frightening thing to drive by field after field of the richest bottomland in the United States and see nothing but corn stobs from last year sticking out of either the water or soggy fields.”

Each day that the planting is delayed the amount of the yield is greatly reduced. Further, because of the delay, many farmers resort to rapid-growing ‘short-term’ corn, which usually yields less per acre than the full-season variety.

Other field crops will also suffer. Rice production in Arkansas, the leading rice state, will no doubt be sharply curtailed. Sugarcane production will be down.

Many acres of cotton have also been affected. Most people think of cotton as only a clothing crop, but, of each 1,500 pounds of picked cotton, approximately 1,000 pounds is food for human use or for livestock. From the 1,000 pounds of seed come cotton-seed oil, cotton-seed meal or cake and cotton-seed hulls. Noted the Arkansas Democrat: “Rain May Be Fall of King Cotton. Federal officials predict that new rainfall in the flooded Mississippi Valley could mean the death knell for cotton crops on the inundated farms of Mississippi and Louisiana.”

Many farmers plan to replace their regular crops with soybeans. These can be planted later in the season and draw high prices. Yet, the president of the American Soybean Association warns that over-planting could result in a sudden drop in soybeans’ market price, in which case the farmers would get reduced returns.

At the same time the American National Cattleman’s Association estimates that 250,000 head of mature cattle have been killed by the Mississippi flooding or in unseasonable snowstorms elsewhere in the United States. Hog production is also off because of muddy fields.

To further complicate matters, the raging Mississippi has kept fertilizer shipments from reaching farmers. The fertilizer shortage, says Missouri agronomist P. G. Stryker, is “frustrating already frustrated farmers.”

Then there is the gasoline shortage. Petroleum suppliers say there may be a sudden rush on existing fuel supplies in farm areas as the flood starts to dry out, creating what one agricultural official calls a “real crunch.”

All these problems, brought on or aggravated by the flooding Mississippi, add up to smaller incomes for the farmer. Many small farmers who have been struggling to get by with a marginal operation may be wiped out.

Says agricultural writer Keith L. Wilkey in the Quincy (Illinois) Herald-Whig:

“Few times, if ever, in the history of U.S. agriculture have farmers gone to the field in the spring confronted by so many imponderables . . . Cataclysmic forces bear down on the farmer from all sides in the same hours that saw one of the wettest springs in history . . . There are always a lot of ‘ifs’ in farming. But few farmers can recall when there was ever as many as this year and surely none can say they recall the issues as being as momentous.”—May 1, 1973.

And, certainly, if the farmer is affected, you the consumer will be. Shorter supply will mean even higher food prices later in the year. A shortage of grain will mean higher costs for bakery products. But it also spells higher prices for beef and other grain-fed stock. Other losses suffered by the farmer will be reflected in your food bill.

Thus the flooding Mississippi has done more than temporarily upset the lives of people in America’s richest food-producing region. It has contributed to the growing specter of food shortage and higher prices facing people world wide.

[Picture on page 15]

All along the Mississippi, volunteers filled sandbags to hold back floodwaters from homes and other important buildings

How Long Could You Survive in Deep Water?

THE National Safety Council estimates that fully one half of the American population would drown if they were pushed one at a time off the deep end of an ordinary swimming pool.

A study at the University of Georgia by Bramwell Gabrielsen disclosed that 71 percent of drowning victims were non-swimmers; 22 percent were rated fair at swimming. Only 1 percent were rated as excellent swimmers.

Although these studies and estimates indicate that your chances of survival are much better if you can swim, yet many swimming coaches doubt that ordinary recreational swimming alone is enough for water survival where distance, rough water, heavy clothing or other difficult circumstances might confront the swimmer. An interesting system for survival was originated by the head swimming coach at the Georgia Institute of Technology, Fred R. Lanoue. Professor Lanoue called his system “drown proofing.”

The Principle of the Technique

The drown-proofing technique is based on the idea that you will fare better in a relaxed upright position just under the water’s surface, coming up only when you must inhale. The basic fact to grasp is that the average human body, even when clothed, tends to float or nearly float.

Picture this: You know that a wooden canoe paddle will float. Now if you fasten enough weight to the blade end to offset very nearly the paddle’s ability to float, what happens? The blade then sinks straight down, pulling the paddle under water. But the unweighted end soon bobs back to the surface. The paddle does not sink; it still floats, but mostly underwater.

Now picture yourself in place of the paddle. Your body will bob along about like the paddle as long as your lungs are free of water. With air in them, your lungs are a natural life preserver. Beginning with this physical fact, Professor Lanoue reasoned that a good way to survive for a long time in water is to manipulate oneself so that one surfaces just enough to breathe, and then coming out of the water just high enough to inhale.

Thus the principle of drown proofing boils down to a matter of relaxing under water in a more or less upright position. Once the principle is applied, even a child five years old can survive in deep water for hours. Persons have bobbed in rough ocean water for twelve hours, and “walked” their way along in the water a distance of twenty miles!

However, this survival method requires practice if it is actually to save your life in an emergency. In view of the fact that some 7,000 persons drown each year in just the United States and Canada, would it not be wise for you and your family to know how to survive in deep water?

Learning the Technique

In learning the drown-proofing technique, the first thing to abandon is the urge to keep your head above water. The idea is to drop your head forward in the water and let your body hang vertically, not in the regular horizontal swimming position. Let your arms hang limply from the shoulders. Hang like a rag in the water.

Do not worry; most people will not sink. Your body will float in the water with only the back of your head above the surface. By hanging there, feet down, you are letting the water do the work of supporting you, and you are conserving your energy.

However, since in this position your nose and mouth are under water, what can you do when you need air after fifteen seconds or so?

Bring your arms up in a relaxed and easy manner, crossing them in front of your head. Also, in the same easy manner lift one leg toward your chest and extend it forward while at the same time you extend the other leg backward. Now raise your head, exhaling through your nose. To keep your head above water long enough for you also to inhale, bring your feet together in a scissors kick, and in an easy movement sweep your crossed arms outward. You want the movement of your arms and legs to be sufficient so that you can get a good breath of air, but not so much that it brings your shoulders out of the water.

As soon as you have taken in air, drop your head in the water again, face down, and bring your arms to your sides. Rest with your body completely relaxed. However, do not hang there in the water until your lungs feel as if they are bursting for air, but come up for air again before you feel an urgent need for it.

By alternately resting and coming up for air in the manner described, you may find that you can stay in the water for quite a long time without becoming fatigued. The advantage is that you are not using up your strength by continuous body movements. Rather, most of the time you are actually resting.

Also, by a slight adjustment in your kick and your hand stroke you will find that you can move forward in the water a couple of feet or so with each emergence for a breath of air. Thus you can cover, in time, a long distance without tiring. Of course, in order for this drown-proofing technique to be effective, you will have to spend time practicing it.

With a knowledge of how to survive a long time in deep water, it is unlikely that you will ever drown. But in most instances if precautions are taken, there is no need to get into a situation where there is a danger of drowning.

So take precautions. Reflect on this sobering fact: Drownings are the second-most-common cause of accidental deaths in the United States. Surely this is good reason for knowing how to survive in deep water.

An Unexpected Blessing from Maintaining Self-Control

SELF-CONTROL is a fruitage of God’s spirit. (Gal. 5:22, 23) Maintaining it under very unpleasant circumstances can make a favorable impression upon observers and may even move them to get to know the Source of this commendable quality. This was the experience of one of Jehovah’s Christian witnesses in California. He relates:

“I awoke early this one morning. Since it was a holiday and I didn’t have to work, I decided to take a walk around the block. As I turned the corner by my new neighbor’s house, I noticed him standing in the yard. Having previously made his acquaintance, I raised my arm and said, ‘Good morning, Don, how are you today?’

“Before he could answer, a long dark streak came charging through the yard and over the fence and started biting me fiercely on the legs. Instinct caused me to put my arms up to protect my face. Immediately Don was at my side. The long dark streak turned out to be his female Doberman pinscher. She mistakenly took my gesture of greeting as signaling an attack upon Don. Before he could quiet her down and get her off me, she had taken quite a few bites and torn my trousers in the process.

“Naturally I was shaken up over the ordeal and so was Don. But here is where the quality of self-control came into view. Instead of blowing up over the incident, I found myself comforting Don and explaining to him that the dog was only acting to protect her master from seeming harm. After establishing that the dog was fully inoculated against rabies, I painfully made my way home, where I immediately contacted a doctor who dressed my wounds and gave me a tetanus shot.

“Shortly thereafter a knock was heard at my door. Upon answering it, I found Don standing there. I invited him in, and he inquired as to how I felt after the doctor’s visit, and so forth. After casual conversation, he said: ‘I suppose you’ll want to have my dog destroyed or perhaps you’ll get your gun and shoot her yourself.’ Again I convinced him that I had no malice toward him or his dog. He was overwhelmed. He couldn’t believe that I had such self-control and wouldn’t repay injury for injury. I calmly explained to him that as one of Jehovah’s witnesses I cultivated the qualities of God’s spirit and that it was only through study and putting into practice what I learned that I was able to display self-control in this incident.

“A few days later my wife called on this neighbor and left the Watchtower and Awake! magazines with Don’s wife Mary. Shortly thereafter a Bible study was started with the family. Don remarked over and over again that any man who could control himself under such adverse conditions must have something going for him.”

What has been the result from all this? Now, as baptized witnesses of Jehovah, Don and Mary also appreciate that displaying the quality of self-control is vital for the Christian.

Watchtower Farm—Unique in Many Ways

THERE are many farms—some three million in the United States. And in Africa and Asia about two thirds of the people are farmers. Yet it can truthfully be said, that, of all these millions, Watchtower Farm is outstandingly unique.

Location does not make it so. Situated about a hundred miles north of New York city, Watchtower Farm lies in a fertile farming area. And its size—1,700 acres—although larger than the average American farm of about 320 acres, is small compared to many.

Also, Watchtower Farm’s fine dairy herd of some 200 Holstein milk cows and heifers is not in itself unusual. Nor is its excellent beef herd of 900 Hereford, Holstein, Angus and Charolais. Neither are its 500 hogs, 3,400 laying hens and 5,000 fryers in themselves unusual. Many modern dairy, beef, hog and chicken farms are much larger in size.

Unique in Diversity

Yet in these days of specialization, is not this diversification unique? True, small farms often have quite a variety of animals. But do you know of another farm that raises such large numbers of different livestock? Watchtower Farm even has fifty hives of bees that provide honey and pollinate crops.

The diversification extends to the crops as well. Seven hundred acres are in field crops, particularly wheat, oats and corn. Another hundred acres grow thirty-five different kinds of vegetables. Still another 200 acres are in woods, and the rest of the land is used principally for pasture, feed pens, barns and other buildings.

Unique In Self-Sufficiency

Watchtower Farm is also unique in its ability to care for its own needs. Few large farms process their own milk, make their own milk products, slaughter their own animals or formulate their own livestock feed. Yet this one does!

Watchtower Farm homogenizes and pasturizes its milk, has a sizable butter and cheese plant, a modern slaughterhouse, a feed mill that grinds and mixes the livestock feed, and a series of grain bins with a storage capacity of 60,000 bushels of various feeds. Also, it has a modern cannery that quick-freezes a hundred thousand quarts of vegetables each year, besides canning tens of thousands of quarts of various fruits and jellies. And, too, there is a large greenhouse in which are grown not only plants for the gardens, but also lettuce and tomatoes in the wintertime and flowers to beautify the farm.

Still more? Yes, it has a modern repair shop, equipped to keep all the farm machinery in good shape. It also has a sawmill that produces lumber for construction of fences, sheds and other such farm structures. To assure a pure water supply the farm has its own water purification plant; and to prevent pollution of the environment, there is a recently completed modern sewage disposal plant.

Watchtower Farm even has its own shale pit and crusher that produce thousands of tons of crushed shale annually, used in building roads, making parking lots and as a base for other concrete construction. Available, too, are large diesels, that will generate the farm’s own electricity should the commercial power source fail. Important too, the farm has its own fire engine.

Is it any wonder that Watchtower Farm has been compared to a modern city, rather than simply a farm? But why is this farm so different? What is its purpose?

Established for a Unique Purpose

The purpose of most large farms is to make money for their owners. But Watchtower Farm was started back in 1963 for an entirely different purpose. Commenting on this, the New York Times earlier this year said: “It is a veritable land of plenty—in everything but profit, for not an ounce is ever sold.”

‘But, how can that be?’ you may ask. How is it possible for a farm ‘not to sell an ounce’ when it produces each year 80,000 gallons of milk, 50,000 pounds of cheese, 60,000 dozen eggs, and over 300,000 pounds of beef, pork and chicken? Who uses all this food?

The large Christian family associated with the world headquarters of Jehovah’s witnesses does. Some 375 members of this family work at Watchtower Farm, and about 1,350 more of them live in Brooklyn, New York. At factories in Brooklyn, Bible literature is produced, including, each day, 100,000 Bibles and books, and more than three quarters of a million Watchtower and Awake! magazines. The purpose of this literature is to direct attention to God’s kingdom, the good news that Jesus Christ foretold would be preached in all the inhabited earth before the end of this system.—Matt. 24:14.

So, then, the unique purpose of Watchtower Farm is to assist in the fulfillment of this Bible prophecy by providing food at reduced cost for the huge headquarters family working to produce this literature. It is basically as the New York Times reported: “The function of the farm: economy in the name of higher spiritual purposes.” And the economy is considerable.

George Couch, who shares in headquarters management, estimates that it costs only 30 cents per meal to feed the headquarters family. “We serve about 2 million meals a year,” Couch explained. “And when we divide the $350,000 a year that it takes to operate the farm along with kitchen expenses by the number of meals served, we arrive at the 30-cent figure.”

Is it unbelievable to you that excellent meals can be provided these days at such a low cost? Another unique feature about the farm makes it possible.

Volunteer Work Force

This feature is that none of the 1,725 members of the headquarters family, including the ninety-six farm workers, receive a commercial salary. One and all receive board and room and $14 a month for incidental expenses. But since all are Christian ministers who are sincerely interested in seeing the good news of God’s kingdom preached in all the inhabited earth, each is happy for the assignment of work he has.

This is reflected in the fine work the farmers do, as noted by a neighboring elderly farm couple who said: “All our lives we’ve lived in this area and we want to say that it’s just wonderful what you folks are doing with the land. My wife and I always slow down when we drive past your farm and we just can’t help wondering at all the young men you have working on it. It’s so unusual, for it seems that today you just can’t keep young folks on the farm.”

But there are many others besides farmers working at Watchtower Farm. Since February 1973 a printing factory has been in operation there, and by May twenty-three workers already were printing and mailing out one and a half million copies of each issue of The Watchtower! And, besides, another printing plant is in the course of construction. When completed this one will have eight acres of floor space; already one section of it has been finished.

So, for many months, the majority of the volunteer work force at Watchtower Farm has been involved in construction of these factories and the recently completed six-floor residence building. Some 250 persons are presently sharing in the construction. These have come from every state in the continental United States. They include a registered architect and civil, electrical and other sorts of engineers.

Construction superintendent Walter Ludke, a forty-five-year-old family man, observed: “Among the older workers are a dozen couples who are grandparents, and even a couple who are great-grandparents. At one time one of the grandfathers was working alongside his grandson. We have many talented youths here who are eager to learn and willing to work hard.”

A tremendous quantity of concrete is required for this construction. Since outside suppliers could not guarantee a sufficient quantity when needed, a concrete mixing plant was purchased and was erected by the, volunteer workers. Max Larson, who shares in construction oversight, noted: “This plant has resulted in a 50-percent saving in every yard of concrete we use. And so the $50,000 plant paid for itself with the first 5,000 yards we made. And by the time the job is finished we will have used about 25,000 yards.”

Because of the prominent part that Watchtower Farm now plays in the furtherance of the Kingdom-preaching world wide, Christians from all parts of the world regularly visit it, including planeloads from the western and midwestern United States and busloads from New England and mid-Atlantic states. Visiting also are newspapermen, farmers and members of neighboring youth day camps and 4-H clubs. All told, some 15,000 persons visited the farm last year.

Modern Efficient Methods

Visitors usually are impressed by the size and efficiency of the farm operation. For example, there are two flocks of some 1,700 laying hens each that are kept in a long, two-section poultry shed. Here all the feeding and watering are done by automation. The shed has a floor of slats with pits underneath for the droppings. Thus it needs to be cleaned only once a year, a front-end loader being employed for this.

After the hens of one flock have laid eggs for a year, the period of their greatest productivity, they are butchered and replaced by another flock ready to lay. One flock is replaced in the spring and the other in the fall, thus keeping production quite uniform. Laying nests are slanted so that the eggs roll forward into a covered tray, which makes for easy gathering. One of those who cares for the chickens is Fred Eckley, a ninety-three-year-old minister.

Very efficient, too, is the operation of the dairy. The one hundred Holsteins pass through a modern milking parlor where they are milked in about an hour and forty-five minutes, twice a day. The milk is piped from the milking machines through glass tubing directly to a 2,000-gallon cooling tank. From there it is fed into a clarification machine, after which it is heated to 139° F. before homogenizing, and at least momentarily to 162.8° F. for pasturizing. It is then stored at 40° F. until shipped to Brooklyn in ten-gallon stainless-steel cans.

Efficient methods are also employed in this the largest beef operation in southern New York State. Each year hundreds of animals are fattened and butchered. The Hereford, Angus and Charolais breeds are confined to feed lots and provided with corn silage, grain supplement and a small amount of hay. “In sixteen to twenty months the heifers finish off at around 950 pounds and the steers at between 1,000 and 1,100 pounds,” Lon Schilling, thirty-three-year-old manager of the beef herd, noted. “Crossbreeding is highly favored,” he added, “resulting in larger, faster-growing steers and heifers.”

…

Refine Search

Index Downloading...

Awake!, June 22, 1973